EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 405 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 405 (2024) 01002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 405, 2024
1st International Conference on Advancements in Sustainable Energy, Materials, and Manufacturing Technology (ICASMMT 2024)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Chemical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440501002
Published online 25 October 2024
  1. Andres RJ, Bowman DT, Jones DC, Kuraparthy V. Major leaf shapes of cotton: genetics and agronomic effects in crop production. J Cotton Sci. 20 (4), 330–340. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai Z, Mao S, Han Y, et al. Study on light interception and biomass production of different cotton cultivars. PLoS One. 11(5), (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. Bourland FM, Watson CE Jr. COTMAP, a technique for evaluating structures and yield of cotton plants. Crop Sci. 30, 224–6 (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campillo C, Fortes R, del Henar Prieto M. Solar radiation effect on crop production solar radiation. In: Babatunde EB, editor. Solar radiation. In Tech (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. Barthélémy D, Caraglio Y. Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Ann Bot. 99, 375–407 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gonias ED, Oosterhuis DM, Bibi AC. Light interception and radiation use efficiency of okra and normal leaf cotton isolines. Environ Exp Bot. 72(2):217–22 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kerby TA, Buxton DR, Matsuda K. Carbon source-sink relationship within narrow-row cotton canopies. Crop Sci. 20:208–13 (1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, ORT DR. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ. 29, 315–30 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  9. Constable GA. Predicting yield responses of cotton to growth regulators. In: Constable GA, Forrester NW, editors. Challenging the futures: proceedings of the world cotton research conference 1. Clayton: CSIRO Publishing (1994). [Google Scholar]
  10. Dauzat J, Clouvel P, Luquet D, Martin P. Using virtual plants to analyse the light-foraging efficiency of a low-density cotton crop. Ann Bot. 101(8):1153–66 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. Competition for Light Interception in Cotton Populations of Different Densities, Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China [Google Scholar]
  12. Du S, Liu L, Liu X, Hu J. Response of canopy solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to the absorbed photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by chlorophyll. Remote Sens. 9(9):911 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Falster DS, Westoby M. Leaf size and angle vary widely across species: what consequences for light interception? New Phytol. 158:509–25 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  14. Khan, N.; Han, Y.; Xing, F.; Feng, L.; Wang, Z.; Wang, G.; Yang, B.; Fan, Z.; Lei, Y.; Xiong, S.; et al. Plant Density Influences Reproductive Growth, Lint Yield and Boll Spatial Distribution of Cotton. Agronomy, 10, 14 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. Maddoni GA, Otegui ME, Cirilo AG. Plant population density and, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation. Field Crops Res. 71, 183–93 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mayo O. The theory of plant breeding. 2nd edition. Oxford: Claredon Press; (1987). [Google Scholar]
  17. Meredith WR. Influence of leaf morphology on lint yield on cotton enhancement by the sub okra trait. Crop Sci. 24, 855–7 (1984). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cotton radiation use efficiency response to plant growth regulators J. Agric. Sci. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  19. Study on Light Interception and Biomass Production of Different Cotton Cultivars. Zhigang Bai, Shuchun Mao, PLoS One. 2016; 11(5): e0156335. Published online (2016). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156335 [Google Scholar]
  20. “The impact of plant density and spatial arrangement on light interception on cotton crop and seed cotton yield: an overview”, Nobell et al. 1993; Murche, Reynold (2013). [Google Scholar]
  21. “Plant morphology and fibre quality as affected by plant population in hemp for fibre production”, S. Amaducci, M. Errani, P.C. Struik, A. Terhürne, G. Venturi, (2001). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.