EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 403 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 403 (2024) 07001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 07001
Number of page(s) 11
Section Conservation, Repair and Strengthening
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440307001
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. A. Penna, C. Calderini, L. Sorrentino, C.F. Carocci, E. Cescatti, R. Sisti, A. Borri, C. Modena, A. Prota, Damage to churches in the 2016 central Italy earthquakes, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. G. Fiorentino, A. Forte, E. Pagano, F. Sabetta, C. Baggio, D. Lavorato, C. Nuti, S. Santini, Damage patterns in the town of Amatrice after August 24th 2016 Central Italy earthquakes, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (2018) 1399–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0254-z. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. İ. Kocaman, The effect of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on historical masonry mosques and minarets, Eng Fail Anal 149 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Bhattacharya, S. Nayak, S.C. Dutta, A critical review of retrofitting methods for unreinforced masonry structures, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 7 (2014) 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2013.12.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Scamardo, M. Zucca, P. Crespi, N. Longarini, S. Cattaneo, Seismic Vulnerability Evaluation of a Historical Masonry Tower: Comparison between Different 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111254. [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Cianchino, M.G. Masciotta, C. Verazzo, G. Brando, An Overview of the Historical Retrofitting Interventions on Churches in Central Italy, Applied Sciences (Switzerland) 13 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010040. [Google Scholar]
  7. M.A. Elgawady, P. Lestuzzi, A review of conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for URM, 13th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Amsterdam, July 4-7, 2004 (2004) 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  8. S.R.S. Rezaee, M. Soltani, M. Nikooravesh, Cyclic in-plane behavior of unreinforced and confined masonry walls retrofitted by shotcrete: Experimental investigation, Eng Struct 264 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114432. [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Casacci, C. Gentilini, A. Di Tommaso, D. V. Oliveira, Shear strengthening of masonry wallettes resorting to structural repointing and FRCM composites, Constr Build Mater 206 (2019) 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.02.044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Cattaneo, P. Crespi, M. Scamardo, N. Vafa, Cyclic behavior of masonry walls retrofitted with post-installed twisted bars or bonded rebars, Constr Build Mater 409 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Jarc Simonič, S. Gostič, V. Bosiljkov, R. Žarnić, In-situ and laboratory tests of old brick masonry strengthened with FRP in innovative configurations and design considerations, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (2015) 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9644-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Decreto Ministeriale 17 Gennaio 2018 C.S.LL.PP. Aggiornamento delle «Norme tecniche per le costruzioni», (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Circolare 21 gennaio 2019, n. 7 C.S.LL.PP. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni», (2019) 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  14. Eartquake planning and protection organization (E.E.P.O.), ΚΑΝ.ΕPΕ. Code of interventions on reinforced concrete buildings, English version after harmonization with Eurocode 8, Part 3, (2013) 1–337. [Google Scholar]
  15. Federal Emergency Management Agency, American Society of Civil Engineers, FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  16. Z. Chen, H. Liu, L. Xu, W. Ge, A review of mechanical properties and carbonation behavior evolution of lime mortar for architectural heritages restoration, Minerals and Mineral Materials 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.20517/mmm.2023.26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Churilov, E. Dumova-Jovanoska, In-plane shear behaviour of unreinforced and jacketed brick masonry walls, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 50 (2013) 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.03.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Ghiassi, M. Soltani, A.A. Tasnimi, Seismic Evaluation of Masonry Structures Strengthened with Reinforced Concrete Layers, (2012). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X. [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Maddaloni, Analisi sperimentale del comportamento di edifici in muratura rinforzati con tecniche e materiali innovativi, PhD Thesis, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  20. L. Biolzi, S. Cattaneo, P. Crespi, M. Scamardo, N. Vafa, Diagonal compression cyclic testing of unreinforced and reinforced masonry walls, Constr Build Mater 363 (2023). [Google Scholar]
  21. ASTM International, ASTM E519 - Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension (Shear) in Masonry Assemblages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0519. [Google Scholar]
  22. M.L. Porter, Sequential Phased Displacement (SPD) Procedure for TCCMAR Testing, in: Third Meeting of the Joint Technical Coordinating Committee on Masonry Research, U.S. - Japan Coordinated Earthquake Research Program, Tomamu, Japan, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Scamardo, S. Cattaneo, P. Crespi, L. Biolzi, Design method for masonry structures retrofitted with steel reinforced plaster, Journal of Building Engineering 79 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107828. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.