Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 14
Section Mortar Properties
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440302012
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. EN 1998-3, Eurocode 8, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. NZSEE, The Seismic Assessment of Existing Buildings: Part C8, Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments, Wellington, New Zealand, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. Papanicolaou, Catherine G., et al. “Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: in-plane cyclic loading.” Materials and structures 40 (2007): 1081-1097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cassese, P., Balestrieri, C., Fenu, L., Asprone, D. and Parisi, F., 2021. In-plane shear behaviour of adobe masonry wallets strengthened with textile reinforced mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 306, p.124832. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrara, Giuseppe, et al. “Shear capacity of masonry walls externally strengthened using Flax-TRM composite systems: Experimental tests and comparative assessment.” Construction and Building Materials 261 (2020): 120490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Del Zoppo, Marta, et al. “Experimental in-plane shear capacity of clay brick masonry panels strengthened with FRCM and FRM composites.” Journal of Composites for Construction 23.5 (2019): 04019038. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Del Zoppo, Marta, et al. “Diagonal compression testing of masonry panels with irregular texture strengthened with inorganic composites.” Materials and Structures 53 (2020): 1-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Angiolilli, Michele, Amedeo Gregori, and Marco Vailati. “Lime-based mortar reinforced by randomly oriented short fibers for the retrofitting of the historical masonry structure.” Materials 13.16 (2020): 3462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vailati, Marco, et al. “Natural-fibrous lime-based mortar for the rapid retrofitting of heritage masonry buildings.” Fibers 9.11 (2021): 68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Majumder, Arnas, et al. “Jute fiber-reinforced mortars: mechanical response and thermal performance.” Journal of Building Engineering 66 (2023): 105888. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Khalaf, N.H., Ibrahim, Y.K. and Mahdi, S.M. “Studying the effect of adding different lengths of glass fibers on some properties of mortar.” Eurasian Journal of Engineering and Technology, 11 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  12. Chawla, Komal, and Bharti Tekwani. “Studies of glass fiber reinforced concrete composites.” International journal of structural and civil engineering research 2.3 (2013): 176-182. [Google Scholar]
  13. Małek, M., Jackowski, M., Łasica, W., Kadela, M. and Wachowski, M., 2021. Mechanical and material properties of mortar reinforced with glass fiber: An experimental study. Materials, 14(3), p.698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou, Boyu, et al. “Experimental study on mechanical property and microstructure of cement mortar reinforced with elaborately recycled GFRP fiber.” Cement and Concrete Composites 117 (2021): 103908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Blazy, Julia, Rafał Blazy, and Łukasz Drobiec. “Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete as a Durable and Enhanced Material for Structural and Architectural Elements in Smart City—A Review.” Materials 15.8 (2022): 2754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Akbar, Arslan, and K. M. Liew. “Multicriteria performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced cement composites: An environmental perspective.” Composites Part B: Engineering 218 (2021): 108937. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stefanidou, M., M. Papachristoforou, and F. Kesikidou. “Fiber-reinforced lime mortars.” proceedings of 4th historic mortars conference (October 10–12 2016), Santorini, Greece. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kesikidou, Fotini, and Maria Stefanidou. “Natural fiber-reinforced mortars.” Journal of Building Engineering 25 (2019): 100786. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Barrios, A. Morón, et al. “Study of the properties of lime and cement mortars made from recycled ceramic aggregate and reinforced with fibers.” Journal of Building Engineering 35 (2021): 102097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Izaguirre, A., Lanas, J. and Alvarez, J.I., 2011. Effect of a polypropylene fibre on the behaviour of aerial lime-based mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 25(2), pp.992-1000. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Campo, Francesco Pietro, et al. “Natural and enhanced carbonation of lime in its different applications: a review.” Environmental Technology Reviews 10.1 (2021): 224-237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lanas, J., Bernal, J.P., Bello, M.A. and Galindo, J.A., 2004. Mechanical properties of natural hydraulic lime-based mortars. Cement and concrete research, 34(12), pp.2191-2201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mercuri, Micaela, Marco Vailati, and Amedeo Gregori. “Lime-based mortar reinforced with randomly oriented polyvinyl-alcohol (PVA) fibers for strengthening historical masonry structures.” Developments in the Built Environment 14 (2023): 100152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bustos-García, Arturo, et al. “Diagonal compression tests on masonry wallets coated with mortars reinforced with glass fibers.” Materials and Structures 52 (2019): 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zagaroli, Armando, et al. “Study on the Mechanical Properties of Two General-Purpose Cement–Lime Mortars Prepared Based on Air Lime.” Materials 17.5 (2024): 1001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. De Vico, F. S., et al. “A Physico-chemical Study of Lime-based Mortars from Different Historical Periods.” NanoWorld J 9.S2 (2023): S256-S261. [Google Scholar]
  27. EN 459-1. “Building lime–Part 1: Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria.” (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. EN 197-1. “Cement–Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements.” (2011). [Google Scholar]
  29. EN 1015-3. “Methods of test for mortar for masonry-Part 3: Determination of consistence of fresh mortar (by flow table).” (1999). [Google Scholar]
  30. EN 1015-11. “Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar.” (2019) [Google Scholar]
  31. ASTM International Committee C09 on Concrete and Concrete Aggregates, 2017. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens1. ASTM international. [Google Scholar]
  32. RILEM, Draft Recommendation. “Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and concrete by means of three-point bend tests on notched beams.” Materials and structures 18.106 (1985): 285-290. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kubica, Jan, and Iwona Galman. “Investigations on flexural and compressive strengths of mortar dedicated to clinker units—Influence of mixing water content and curing time.” Materials 15.1 (2022): 347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Chandra, S., and J. Björnström. “Influence of cement and superplasticizers type and dosage on the fluidity of cement mortars—Part I.” Cement and Concrete Research 32.10 (2002): 1605-1611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gettu, R., et al. “Study of the distribution and orientation of fibers in SFRC specimens.” Materials and Structures 38 (2005): 31-37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lakho, N. A., and M. A. Zardari. “Relation between Compressive Strength of Baked Clay Cubes and Cylinders. Engineering, 8, 509-514.” (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, X.X., Ruiz, G., Yu, R.C. and Tarifa, M., 2009. Fracture behaviour of high-strength concrete at a wide range of loading rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36(10-11), pp.1204-1209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Abd el Aty, Metwally Abd Allah. “Influence of bending deflection rate on properties of fibrous mortar.” HBRC Journal 9.1 (2013): 27-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.