Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 02002 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Mortar Properties | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440302002 | |
Published online | 16 September 2024 |
- L. Li and M. Wu, “An overview of utilizing CO2 for accelerated carbonation treatment in the concrete industry,” Journal of CO2 Utilization, vol. 60. Elsevier Ltd, Jun. 01, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102000. [Google Scholar]
- C. Moro, V. Francioso, M. Lopez-Arias, and M. Velay-Lizancos, “CO2 curing of mortar with natural and recycled concrete aggregate: An environmental and economic assessment,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 399, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Grilo, P. Faria, R. Veiga, A. Santos Silva, V. Silva, and A. Velosa, “New natural hydraulic lime mortars - Physical and microstructural properties in different curing conditions,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 54, pp. 378–384, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.078. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Lawrence, “A study of carbonation in non-hydraulic lime mortars,” PhD-Thesis, University of Bath, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- D. R. Moorehead, “Cementation by the carbonation of hydrated lime,” Cem Concr Res, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 700–708, 1986, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(86)90044-X. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- N. Zalmanoff, “Carbonation of Lime Putties To Produce High Grade Building Units,” Rock Products, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 182–186, Aug. 1956. [Google Scholar]
- N. Zalmanoff, “Carbonation of Lime Putties To Produce High Grade Building Units,” Rock Products, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 84–90, Sep. 1956. [Google Scholar]
- D. Ergenç and R. Fort, “Accelerating carbonation in lime-based mortar in high CO2 environments,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 188, pp. 314–325, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Cultrone, E. Sebastián, and M. O. Huertas, “Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: Mineralogical and textural changes,” Cem Concr Res, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 2278–2289, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.12.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Arizzi, J. Martínez-Martínez, G. Cultrone, and D. Benavente, “Mechanical evolution of lime mortars during the carbonation process,” Key Eng Mater, vol. 465, pp. 483–486, 2011, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.465.483. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- BS EN 459-2:2010, “Building lime Part 2, Test methods,” 2010. [Google Scholar]
- BS EN 1015-11:2019, “Methods of test for mortar for masonry,” 2019. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM International, “ASTM E 1876 – 01: Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young’s Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson’s Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration,” West Conshohocken, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- BS EN 196-1-1995, “Methods of testing cement - Part 1: Determination of strength,” 1995. [Google Scholar]
- L. Fusade and H. A. Viles, “A comparison of standard and realistic curing conditions of natural hydraulic lime repointing mortar for damp masonry: Impact on laboratory evaluation,” J Cult Herit, vol. 37, pp. 82–93, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2018.11.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Arizzi, G. Martinez-Huerga, E. Sebastián-Pardo, and G. Cultrone, “Mineralogical, textural and physical-mechanical study of hydraulic lime mortars cured under different moisture conditions,” Materiales de Construccion, vol. 65, no. 318, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.3989/mc.2015.03514. [Google Scholar]
- K. Van Balen and D. Van Gemert, “Modelling lime mortar carbonation,” Mater Struct, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 393–398, Aug. 1994, doi: 10.1007/BF02473442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.