Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 402, 2024
The 4th International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovative Researches (The 4th ICETIR 2022)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geological Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440203003
Published online 23 August 2024
  1. Indonesian Disaster Data and Information. (2021). Landslides occurred in Central Java in 2020. https://dibi.bnpb.go.id/xdibi (accessed on September 3, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  2. Zaenurrohman, J.A., & Permanajati, I. (2019). Zona Kerentanan Gerakan Tanah (Longsor) di Daerah Kedungbanteng Menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Prosiding Seminar Nasional dan Call for Papers. LPPM Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Vol. 9 No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Condon, W., et all. (1996). Peta Geologi Lembar Banjarnegara dan Pekalongan Skala 1:100.000. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi : Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  4. Van Bemmelen, R. W. (1949). The Geology of Indonesia. General Geology of Indonesia and Adjacent Archipelagoes. In Government Printing Office, The Hague (pp. 1–766). [Google Scholar]
  5. Permanajati, I., Zakaria, Z., Hadian, M.S.D., Anwar, H.Z., Setijadi, R. (2018). The Impact of Physical and Chemical Properties to Form Slip Surface in Piroclastic Breccia in Pawinihan Landslide, Banjarnegara. IOP Conferences [Google Scholar]
  6. Series, Earth and Environment Science. UPI. Bandung. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kusnadi, Torizin, J., Fuchs, M., & Arifianti, Y. (2012). Geo-Factor Maps Sebagai Parameter Dalam Analisis Tanah Longsor Dengan Metode Statistik ... October [Google Scholar]
  8. Pamela, Sadisun, I. A., Kartiko, R. D., & Arifianti, Y. (2018). Metode Kombinasi Weight of Evidence (WoE) dan Logistic Regression (LR) untuk Pemetaan Kerentanan Gerakan Tanah di Takengon, Aceh. Jurnal Lingkungan Dan Bencana Geologi. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kayastha, P., Dhital, M. R., & De Smedt, F. (2012). Landslide susceptibility mapping using the weight of evidence method in the Tinau watershed, Nepal. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0163-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., Gokceoglu, C., Mohammadi, M., & Moradi, H. R. (2013). Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(7), 2351–2365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0532-7 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vakhshoori, V., & Zare, M. (2016). Landslide susceptibility mapping by comparing the weight of evidence, fuzzy logic, and frequency ratio methods. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 7(5), 1731–1752. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1144655 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kose, D. D., & Turk, T. (2019). GIS-based fully automatic landslide susceptibility analysis by weight-of-evidence and frequency ratio methods. Physical Geography, 40(5), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2018.1559583 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kayastha, P., Dhital, M. R., & De Smedt, F. (2012). Landslide susceptibility mapping using the weight of evidence method in the Tinau watershed, Nepal. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0163-z [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xie, Z., Chen, G., Meng, X., Zhang, Y., Qiao, L., & Tan, L. (2017). A comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping using weight of evidence, logistic regression and support vector machine and evaluated by SBAS-InSAR monitoring: Zhouqu to Wudu segment in Bailong River Basin, China. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6640-7 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.