Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 400, 2024
5th International Conference on Sustainable Practices and Innovations in Civil Engineering (SPICE 2024)
Article Number 02009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering
Published online 03 July 2024
  1. IPCC. (2018). “Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change.” [Google Scholar]
  2. Government of India. (2015). “Submission on the Road to COP21 Paris: Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs).” Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India. [Google Scholar]
  3. IEA (2021), Coal 2021, IEA, Paris [Google Scholar]
  4. Rochelle, G. T. (2009). Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science, 325(5948), 1652–1654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Danckwerts, P. V. (1979). The absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous solutions of alkali. Chemical Engineering Science, 34(3), 443–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Iliuta, M. C., Larachi, F., & Păvăloiu, R. D. (2007). Carbon dioxide capture by reactive absorption with chemical solvents: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 46(20), 6413–6437. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rubin, E. S., & Chen, C. (2019). Technological learning in CCS: Lessons from historical development trajectories. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 88, 246–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sunkyung Kim, Hu Shi, Jin Yong Lee, CO2 absorption mechanism in amine solvents and enhancement of CO2 capture capability in blended amine solvent, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Volume 45, 2016, Pages 181–188, ISSN 1750-5836, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reynolds A. Frimpong, Don Johnson, Lisa Richburg, Brian Hogston, Joseph E. Remias, James K. Neathery, Kunlei Liu, Comparison of solvent performance for CO2 capture from coal-derived flue gas: A pilot scale study, Chemical Engineering Research and Design, Volume 91, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 963–969, ISSN 0263-8762, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Omoregbe, O., Mustapha, A.N., Steinberger-Wilckens, R., El-Kharouf, A., Onyeaka, H., 2020. Carbon capture technologies for climate change mitigation: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific discourse during 1998–2018. Energy Reports 6, 1200–1212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Eliane Blomen, Chris Hendriks, Filip Neele, Capture technologies: Improvements and promising developments, Energy Procedia, Volume 1, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1505–1512, ISSN 1876-6102, [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ashkanani HE, Wang R, Shi W, Siefert NS, Thompson RL, Smith K, Steckel JA, Gamwo IK, Hopkinson D, Resnik K, Morsi BI (2020) Levelized cost of CO2 captured using fve physical solvents in pre-combustion applications. Int J Greenh Gas Control 101:103135. ISSN 1750-5836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. UOP Method 829-82. (1982) Titrimetric determination of CO2 in ethanolamines. ASTM Intl. Publ. [Google Scholar]
  14. Arnold JL and Pearce RL (1960) Analysis of glycol and amine solutions and the interpretation thereof. Gas conditioning Inst., Liberal, Kansas. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.