Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 393, 2024
2nd International Conference on Sustainable Technologies and Advances in Automation, Aerospace and Robotics (STAAAR-2023)
Article Number 02007
Number of page(s) 12
Section Design, Development, and Optimization
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439302007
Published online 13 March 2024
  1. T. Yasuda, C. Wu, N. Nakagawa, and K. Nagamura, “Studies on an automobile muffler with the acoustic characteristic of low-pass filter and Helmholtz resonator,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 49–57, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Deryabin and A. Krasnov, “Determination of the Characteristics of Noise - Reducing Materials for Motor Transport,” Transp. Res. Procedia, vol. 68, pp. 630–635, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.02.086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Kashikar, R. Suryawanshi, N. Sonone, R. Thorat, and S. Savant, “Development of muffler design and its validation,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 180, p. 108132, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Siano and D. D’Agostino, “Acoustic Optimization of an Intake System by Means of Geometry CAD Modifications,” Energy Procedia, vol. 82, pp. 23–30, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. D. Zhu and Z. L. Ji, “Transmission loss prediction of reactive silencers using 3-D time-domain CFD approach and plane wave decomposition technique,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 112, pp. 25–31, 2016, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.05.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. L. Parrondo, J. Fernández, I. García, and E. Ruiz, “Noise transmission through duct divisions in air circuits, considered as three-port acoustic systems,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 296, no. 1, pp. 183–194, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.02.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Chivate, P. Hujare, R. Askhedkar, D. Hujare, and S. Chinchanikar, “A review on acoustic performance analysis of reactive muffler,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 63, pp. 613–622, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. K. Gupta, Ravi Jatola, “Analysis of Noise Level with Convergent and Divergent Shape of Muffler and its Impact on Noise Pollution,” IJERR, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 58–65, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v36.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. K. Gupta, Ravi Jatola, “Enhancing Sound Transmission Loss in Hybrid Mufflers with Change in Pipe Perforation and Using Absorptive Material,” IJERR, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 178–184, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2023.v36.017. [Google Scholar]
  10. U. Chhibber, R. Kumar, S. Haldar, and R. N. Hota, “Design and analysis of a compact acoustic filter for broad band noise absorption,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 140, no. May, pp. 30–38, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. D. Gaonkar, D. R. Rao, K. M. Kumar, and M. L. Munjal, “End corrections for double-tuning of the same-end inlet-outlet muffler,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 159, p. 107116, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Fu, W. Zheng, M. Xu, W. Wang, and Y. Huang, “Study on the influence of structure factors of diesel engine exhaust purification muffler on transmission loss in different frequency bands,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 180, p. 108147, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. K. S. Won and J. Choe, “Transmission loss analysis in a partitioned duct with porous boundaries based on combination of FEM and measurement of sound absorption coefficients,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 165, p. 107291, 2020, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C.-M. Lee and Y. S. Wang, “A prediction method of the acoustical properties of multilayered noise control materials in standing wave-duct systems,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 298, no. 1, pp. 350–365, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Barbieri and N. Barbieri, “Finite element acoustic simulation based shape optimization of a muffler,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 346–357, 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. C. P. O. A. Guhan, G. Arthanareeswaran, K. N. Varadarajan, and S. Krishnan, “Exhaust System Muffler Volume Optimization of Light Commercial Vehicle Using CFD Simulation,” Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 8471–8479, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Philipson and M. S. Lawless, “Application of a dual stage exhaust system using expansion chambers for formula SAE,” Proc. Meet. Acoust., Vol. 42, no. 1, 2020, DOI: 10.1121/2.0001369. [Google Scholar]
  18. A. J. Torregrosa, A. Gil, L. M. García-Cuevas, P. Quintero, and F. D. Denia, “Prediction of the transmission loss in a flexible chamber,” J. Fluids Struct., vol. 82, pp. 134–153, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.07.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Guo and W. bo Tang, “Transfer matrix methods for sound attenuation in resonators with perforated intruding inlets,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 116, pp. 14–23, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Shao, H. He, Y. Chen, X. Tan, and G. Chen, “A tunable metamaterial muffler with a membrane structure based on Helmholtz cavities,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 157, p. 107022, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Shen and L. Hou, “Comparison of various algorithms for improving acoustic attenuation performance and flow characteristic of reactive mufflers,” Appl. Acoust., vol. 116, pp. 291–296, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. X. Yu, H. Fang, F. Cui, L. Cheng, and Z. Lu, “Origami-inspired foldable sound barrier designs,” J. Sound Vib., vol. 442, pp. 514–526, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/jjsv.2018.11.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Mohammad, M. Farid, and M. Said, “Muffler Internal Geometry Parametric Study Related to Sound Transmission Loss and Pressure Drop,” no. December, pp. 12–25, 2021. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.