Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 392, 2024
International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Development (ICMED 2024)
Article Number 01044
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439201044
Published online 18 March 2024
  1. Aguiar, L. C., & Lundgren, T. (2022). The platform economy and the future of work: A review of the literature. Journal of Industrial Relations, 64(4), 510-537. [Google Scholar]
  2. Asilomar AI Principles (2017). Retrieved from: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/aiprinciples Autor, D. H., Acemoglu, D., &Autor, D. (2017). On the measurement of technological progress and productivity growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 3-34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dinçer, H., Islam, M. S., &Wijewardhana, H. (2023). Towards ethical AI in the platform economy: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Information Systems Journal, 33(1), 188-208. [Google Scholar]
  5. Etzioni, A. (2020). The driverless revolution: How driverless cars are likely to reshape our roads, cities, and lives. Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  6. Feller, A., Benschop, M., &Abbasi, A. (2018). Algorithmic bias in online labor markets: A review. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 643-662. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Graham, M., Langley, P., & Lehr, D. (2017). Sharing the wealth: Can crowdfunding platforms democratize finance? Journal of Business Ethics, 144(4), 915-932. [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham, M., Hjorth, I., & Gray, M. (2023). The gig economy and the future of work: A global perspective Manyika, M., Lund, S., Bughin, M., Woetzel, J., Staiger, P., & Chui, M. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. McKinsey Global Institute. [Google Scholar]
  10. Mittelstadt, B. D. (2016). Principles for accountable algorithmic decision-making. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, 75-80. [Google Scholar]
  11. Özbilgin, M., Gundogdu, N., &Akalin, C. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Gig Economyand Precarity. In E.Meliou, J. Vassilopoulou, M. Ozbilgin (Eds). Diversity and PrecariousWork during Socio-Economic Upheaval. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosenfeld, J. (2019). Gigged: The rise of the insecure and unequal workplace. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenfeld, J. (2020). California’s AB5: A milestone in the fight for gig worker rights, but much work remains. Harvard Business Review. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang, W., & Wang, H. (2020). Adaptive e-learning: A review of current trends and future directions. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 13(3), 126-135. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu, X., Lu, Y., &Whinston, A. B. (2020). Dynamic pricing in the sharing economy: A demand-driven approach. Management Science, 66(7), 3006-3026. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.