Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 392, 2024
International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research and Sustainable Development (ICMED 2024)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439201005
Published online 18 March 2024
  1. [1] Thangamani, K. “Effect of magnetic water and neem leaves ash on strength properties.” Materials Today: Proceedings 79 (2023): 406-410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. [2] Gholhaki, Majid, Mohammadkazem Sharbatdar, and Ghasem Pachideh. “An experimental investigation into the mechanical performance and microstructure of cementitious mortars containing recycled waste materials subjected to various environments.” Journal of Building Engineering 61 (2022): 105275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. [3] Thangamani, K., N. Naveen Kumar, and T. S. Babu. “Experimental study on partial replacement of cement with using marble powder and coarse aggregate with demolished waste.” AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2648. No. 1. AIP Publishing, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  4. [4] Chinnu, S. N., et al. “Reuse of industrial and agricultural by-products as pozzolan and aggregates in lightweight concrete.” Construction and Building Materials 302 (2021): 124172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. [5] Yew, Ming Kun, et al. “Effects of pre-treated on dura shell and tenera shell for high strength lightweight concrete.” Journal of Building Engineering 42 (2021): 102493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. [6] Cai, Qiang, et al. “Utilization of waste red gypsum in autoclaved aerated concrete preparation.” Construction and Building Materials 291 (2021): 123376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. [7] Poongodi, K., et al. “Durability properties of self-compacting concrete made with recycled aggregate.” Silicon 13.8 (2021): 2727-2735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. [8] Kalpana, M., and S. Mohith. “A study on compressive behavior of AAC added with industrial waste.” Materials Today: Proceedings 22 (2020): 1043-1046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. [9] Zafar, Muhammad Saeed, et al. “Sustainable incorporation of waste granite dust as partial replacement of sand in autoclave aerated concrete.” Construction and Building Materials 250 (2020): 118878. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. [10] Raj, Amit, Arun Ch Borsaikia, and Uday S. Dixit. “Evaluation of mechanical properties of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) block and its masonry.” Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 101 (2020): 315-325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. [11] Xu, Rongsheng, et al. “Utilizing wood fiber produced with wood waste to reinforce autoclaved aerated concrete.” Construction and Building Materials 208 (2019): 242-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. [12] Aliabdo, Ali A., Abd-Elmoaty M. Abd-Elmoaty, and Hani H. Hassan. “Utilization of crushed clay brick in cellular concrete production.” Alexandria Engineering Journal 53.1 (2014): 119-130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. [13] Kurama, H., I. B. Topcu, and C. Karakurt. “Properties of the autoclaved aerated concrete produced from coal bottom ash.” Journal of materials processing technology 209.2 (2009): 767-773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. [14] Pachideh, Ghasem, and Majid Gholhaki. “Effect of pozzolanic materials on mechanical properties and water absorption of autoclaved aerated concrete.” Journal of Building Engineering 26 (2019): 100856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. [15] Kurama, H., I. B. Topcu, and C. Karakurt. “Properties of the autoclaved aerated concrete produced from coal bottom ash.” Journal of materials processing technology 209.2 (2009): 767-773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. [16] Hauser, André, Urs Eggenberger, and Thomas Mumenthaler. “Fly ash from cellulose industry as secondary raw material in autoclaved aerated concrete.” Cement and Concrete Research 29.3 (1999): 297-302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.