Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 389, 2024
11th International Symposium on Occupational Health and Safety (SESAM 2023)
Article Number 00022
Number of page(s) 10
Published online 10 January 2024
  1. Hardwick, Meredith, Hall, John, Tatom, John, and Baker, Robert, Approved Methods and Algorithms for DoD Risk-Based Explosive Siting, DDESB Technical Paper 14, 21 July 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P., Logic or the Art of Thinking, 1996. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pfitzer, T., Use of Fatality as the Measure of Risk, Tech Memo E1-00300, A-P-T Research, Inc., Huntsville, AL, May 8, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Institute of Makers of Explosives Safety Analysis for Risk - User ‘s Reference Manual, Version 2. October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. IMESAFR P(e) Matrix Tech Memo, APT Report CM-07400, May 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. RCC Standard 321-00, Common Risk Criteria for National Test Ranges; Inert Debris, published by Secretariat, Range Commanders Council, US Army White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico 88002-5110, April 2000. [Google Scholar]
  7. “RBESCT Technical Issues Regarding Injury Modeling,” APT CE3-00300, 26 February 2004. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.