Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 385, 2023
The 15th International Scientific Conference of Civil and Environmental Engineering for the PhD. Students and Young Scientists – Young Scientist 2023 (YS23)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01043 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202338501043 | |
| Published online | 30 October 2023 | |
- A. Krim, A. Arab, M. Chemam, A. Brahim, M. Sadek, & I. Shahrour. Experimental study on the liquefaction resistance of sand-clay mixtures: Effect of clay content and grading characteristics. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 37(2), 129–141 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. Goodarzi, & H. Shahnazari. Strength enhancement of geotextile-reinforced carbonate sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(2), 128–139 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. Venkateswarlu, K. N. Ujjawal, & A. Hegde. Laboratory and numerical investigation of machine foundations reinforced with geogrids and geocells. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46(6), 882–896 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H. L. Wang, Y. J. Cui, F. Lamas-Lopez, N. Calon, G. Saussine, J.C. Dupla, … & R.P. Chen. Investigation on the mechanical behavior of track-bed materials at various contents of coarse grains. Construction and Building Materials, 164, 228–237 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Kim, & S. Ha. Effects ofparticle size on the shear behavior of coarse-grained soils reinforced with geogrid. Materials, 7(2), 963–979 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- M. Beren, I. Cobanoglu, S. B. Çelik, & Ö. Ündül. Shear Rate Effect on Strength Characteristics of Sandy Soils. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 57(4), 281–287 (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. N. Islam, A. Siddika, M. B. Hossain, A. Rahman, and M. A. Asad. Effect ofparticle size on the shear strength of sand. Australian Geomechanics, 46(3), September 2011. [Google Scholar]
- W. M. Kirkpatrick. Effects of grain size and grading on the shearing behavior of granular materials. Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (pp. 273–277), September 1965. [Google Scholar]
- N. D. Marschi, C. K. Chan, & H. B. Seed. Evaluation of properties of rockfill materials. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98(1), 95–114 (1972). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- R. J. Marsal. Mechanical properties of rockfill. In Embankment-Dam Engineering, R.C. Hirschfeld and S.J. [Google Scholar]
- J. S. Zelasko, R. J. Krizek, & T. B. Edil. Shear Behavior of Sands as a Function of Grain Characteristics., 1, 55–64 (1975). [Google Scholar]
- F. H. Kulhawy, & P. W. Mayne. Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design (No. EPRI-EL-6800). Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, CA (USA); Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY (USA). Geotechnical Engineering Group (1990). [Google Scholar]
- B. A. Castellanos, & T. L. Brandon. A comparison between the shear strength measured with direct shear and triaxial devices on undisturbed and remolded soils. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris (Vol. 2013, pp. 317–320) (2013). [Google Scholar]
- M. E. D. M. Abdel-Ghaffar. The meaning and practical significance of the cohesion intercept in soil mechanics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign (1990). [Google Scholar]
- K. Thermann, C. Gau, & J. Tiedemann. Shear strength parameters from direct shear tests-influencing factors and their significance. The Geological Society of London (Vol. 484, pp. 1–12) (2006). [Google Scholar]
- R. Saito, H. Fukuoka, & K. Sassa. Experimental study on the rate effect on the shear strength. Disaster Mitigation of Debris Flows, Slope Failures and Landslides, 421–427 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- T. Nakao, & S. Fityus. Direct shear testing of a marginal material using a large shear box. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 31(5), 393–403 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- ASTM D 3080: Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions, ASTM International (2012). [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.