Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 379, 2023
18e Congrès de la Société Française de Génie des Procédés (SFGP2022)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Développements méthodologiques pour le Génie des Procédés / Methodologies for Chemical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202337901002
Published online 12 May 2023
  1. Birkholzer, J., Zhou, Q., Tsang, C., 2009. Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3, 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2008.08.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chasset, C., Jarsjö, J., Erlström, M., Cvetkovic, V., Destouni, G., 2011. Scenario simulations of CO2 injection feasibility, plume migration and storage in a saline aquifer, Scania, Sweden. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 5, 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.06.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Das, A.K., Dejam, M., Hassanzadeh, H., 2022. New line-source solution and scaling relations for diffusive leakage of brine from an infinite aquifer-caprock composite domain during geological storage of CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 118, 103664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103664 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ding, T., Liu, Y., Hua, X., 2019. Influence of interphase mass transfer and diffusion processes on CO2brine displacement in saline aquifers. Environ. Earth Sci. 78, 654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665019-8679-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. dos Santos, P.F., André, L., Ducousso, M., Lassin, A., Contamine, F., Lach, A., Parmentier, M., Cézac, P., 2021. An improved model for CO2 solubility in aqueous Na+–Cl−–SO42− systems up to 473.15 K and 40 MPa. Chem. Geol. 582, 120443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120443 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Girard, C., 2013. Modélisation par prise de moyenne volumique des phénomènes de transports en milieu poreux réactif : application au garnissage d’une colonne d’absorption gaz-liquide 243. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jin, M., 2016. Geochemical modelling of formation damage risk during CO2 injection in saline aquifers. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 17. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, Y., Wang, L., Liu, X., Ding, T., 2014. Effects of capillary pressure – fluid saturation – relative permeability relationships on predicting carbon dioxide migration during injection into saline aquifers. Energy Procedia 63, 3616–3631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.392 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peng, D.-Y., Robinson, D.B., 1976. A New Two-Constant Equation of State. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 15, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1021/i160057a011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Quintard, M., Whitaker, S., 1999. Dissolution of an Immobile Phase during Flow in Porous Media. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38, 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie980212t [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Quintard, M., Whitaker, S., 1993. Transport in ordered and disordered porous media: volumeaveraged equations, closure problems, and comparison with experiment. Chem. Eng. Sci. 48, 2537–2564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(93)80266-S [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sin, I., Corvisier, J., 2019. 6. Multiphase Multicomponent Reactive Transport and Flow Modeling, in: Druhan, J., Tournassat, C. (Eds.), Reactive Transport in Natural and Engineered Systems. De Gruyter, pp. 143–196. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512001-007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, C., 2020. A comprehensive pore scale and volume average study on solid/liquid phase change in a porous medium. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 14. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wolf, J.L., 2016. Benefits and restrictions of 2D reactive transport simulations of CO2 and SO2 coinjection into a saline aquifer using TOUGHREACT V3.0-OMP. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 17. [Google Scholar]
  15. Yang, C., Huang, R., Lin, Y., Qiu, T., 2020. Volume averaging theory (VAT) based modeling for longitudinal mass dispersion in structured porous medium with porous particles. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 153, 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.10.048 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.