Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 378, 2023
SMARTINCS’23 Conference on Self-Healing, Multifunctional and Advanced Repair Technologies in Cementitious Systems
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 06005 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Service Life Design and LCA of Concrete Structures and Infrastructure | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202337806005 | |
Published online | 28 April 2023 |
- K.L. Scrivener, V.M. John, and E.M. Gartner, “Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry,” Cem Concr Res, vol. 114, no. February, pp. 2–26, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Bentur, “Closure to ‘Cementitious Materials— Nine Millennia and a New Century: Past, Present, and Future ’ by Arnon Bentur,” Journal ofMaterials in Civil Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 412–412, 2003, doi: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2003)15:4(412). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- EuLA, “A Competitive And efficient Lime industry,” 2019. [Online]. Available: www.eula.eu [Google Scholar]
- E.L. Association, “Innovation in the lime sector Innovation that delivers on sustainability,” 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.eula.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Innovation-in-the-Lime-Sector-.pdf [Google Scholar]
- A. Laveglia, L. Sambataro, N. Ukrainczyk, N. de Belie, and E. Koenders, “Hydrated lime life-cycle assessment: Current and future scenarios in four EU countries,” J Clean Prod, vol. 369, p. 133224, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/jjclepro.2022.133224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- D. Rodriguez-Robles, P. van den Heede, and N. De Belie, “Life cycle assessment applied to recycled aggregate concrete,” in New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete, 2018, pp. 207–256. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102480-5.00009-9. [Google Scholar]
- P. Van Den Heede and N. De Belie, “Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations,” Cem Concr Compos, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 431–442, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- C. Jiménez, M. Barra, A. Josa, and S. Valls, “LCA of recycled and conventional concretes designed using the Equivalent Mortar Volume and classic methods,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 84, pp. 245–252, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.051. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Diaz-Basteris, J.C. Sacramento Rivero, and B. Menéndez, “Life cycle assessment of restoration mortars and binders,” Constr Build Mater, vol. 326, no. December 2021, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126863. [Google Scholar]
- T. Schlegel and A. Shtiza, “Lime carbonation, environmental footprint of seven mortars placed on the European market,” pp. 931–936, 2016. Online Proceedings Library. doi: 10.1201/b21889-127 [Google Scholar]
- S.B. Marinkovic, M. Malesev, and I. Ignjatovic, “Life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete made using recycled concrete or natural aggregates,” Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Eco-Labelling and Case Studies, pp. 239–266, 2013, doi: 10.1533/9780857097729.2.239. [Google Scholar]
- T. Ding, J. Xiao, and V.W.Y. Tam, “A closed-loop life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete utilization in China,” Waste Management, vol. 56, pp. 367–375, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.05.031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Asadollahfardi, A. Katebi, P. Taherian, and A. Panahandeh, “Environmental life cycle assessment of concrete with different mixed designs,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–12, 2019, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2019.1579015. [Google Scholar]
- A. Petek Gursel, E. Masanet, A. Horvath, and A. Stadel, “Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review,” Cem Concr Compos, vol. 51, pp. 38–48, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005. [Google Scholar]
- P. van den Heede and N. de Belie, “Sustainability assessment of potentially ‘green’ concrete types using life cycle assessment,” in Sustainable and Nonconventional Construction Materials using Inorganic Bonded Fiber Composites, 2017, pp. 235–263. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102001-2.00010-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Antonia, K. Christopher, K. Maria, A. Eleni, B. Asterios, and D. Aris, “Life Cycle Analysis of Mortars and its Environmental Impact,” MRS Online Proceedings Library, vol. 895, no. 1, p. 602, 2006, doi: 10.1557/PROC-0895-G06-02. [Google Scholar]
- G.M. Cuenca-Moyano, S. Zanni, A. Bonoli, and I. Valverde-Palacios, “Development of the life cycle inventory of masonry mortar made of natural and recycled aggregates,” J Clean Prod, vol. 140, pp. 1272–1286, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ISO, “14040: Environmental management-life cycle assessment—Principles and framework,” International organization for standardization, vol. 2006, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- A. Petrillo, F. Colangelo, I. Farina, M. Travaglioni, C. Salzano, and R. Cioffi, “Multi-criteria analysis for Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of lightweight artificial aggregates from industrial waste by double-step cold bonding palletization,” J Clean Prod, vol. 351, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/jjclepro.2022.131395. [Google Scholar]
- T. Schlegel and A. Shtiza, “Environmental footprint study of mortar, render and plaster formulation / Studie über die Umweltauswirkungen von Mörtel,” Mauerwerk, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 370–382, 2015, doi: 10.1002/dama.201500676. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- World Development Report 2019: The Changing Nature of Work. “Carbon Pricing 2021 State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2021,” 2021, doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648. [Google Scholar]
- E. Central Bank, “Economic Bulletin Issue 3, 2022.”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/ecbu/eb202203.en.pdf [Google Scholar]
- C.M. Rochman, C. Manzano, B.T. Hentschel, S.L.M. Simonich, and E. Hoh, “Polystyrene plastic: A source and sink for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the marine environment,” Environ Sci Technol, vol. 47, no. 24, pp. 13976–13984, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1021/es403605f. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.