Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 373, 2022
10th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2022”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development
Article Number 00078
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237300078
Published online 20 December 2022
  1. Brundtland, G. H., Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: “our common future”. United Nations (1987) [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission, Leipzig, Chart of Sustainable European Cities and Towns, Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/aechive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf (2007) [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commission. The State of European Cities: Cities leading the way to a better future, Publications Office of the European Union Luxemburg. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2016/10/20-10-2016-state-of-europeancities-report-cities-leading-the-way-to-a-better-future (2016) [Google Scholar]
  4. Guvernul Romaniei, Ministerul Investitiilor si Proiectelor Europene, Implementarea programelor operationale 2007–2013. Available at http://mfe.gov.ro/minister/perioade-deprogramare/perioada-2007-2013/ [Google Scholar]
  5. Ce este sustenabilitatea, The Welding Institute (TWI). Available at https://www.twiglobal.com/locations/romania/ce-facem/intrebari-frecvente-faq/ce-este-sustenabilitatea (2022) [Google Scholar]
  6. U.N. Desa, Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Costanza, L. Daly, L. Fioramonti, E. Giovannini, I. Kubiszewski, L.F. Mortensen, & R. Wilkinson, Modeling and measuring sustainable well-being in connection with the Sustainable Development Goals, Ecological Economics, 130, 350–355 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Lane, Will sustainable tourism research be sustainable in the future? An opinion piece, Tour.Mang. Perspect, 25161–164 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. European Commission, Brussels, 28.11.2018 COM 773 final, Communication From The Commission to The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The Economic and Social Committee, The Committee of The Regions and The European Investment Bank, A long-term prosperous, modern, competitive and climate-neutral economy (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Biermann, N. Kanie, R.E. Kim, Global governance by goal setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31, ISSN 1877–3435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010, Available on https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877343517300209 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Økland, Gap analysis to incorporate sustainability in project management. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 103-109 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. A.J. Silvius & R.P. Schipper, Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4(1), 63–96 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. A.G. Silvius & R. Schipper, A maturity model for integrating sustainability in projects and project management. At the 24th World Congress of the International Project Management Association (IPMA) Istanbul, Turkey (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Kostalova & J. McGrath, Sustainability in Project Management: Two sides of the same coin or poles apart? (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Keating, The Agenda of the Earth Summit for Change. Centre for our Common Future (1993) [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Sengers, A.J. Wieczorek, R. Raven, Experimenting for Sustainability Transitions: A systematic review of the Literature. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Changes 145, 153e164 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Kiani Mavi, C. Standing, Critical success factors of sustainable project management in construction: a fuzzy Dematel-Anp approach. Clean, J. Prod. 194, 751e765 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Thürer, I. Tomasevic, M. Stevenson, T. Qu, D. Huisingh, A systematic review of the literature on the integration of sustainability into engineering curricula. Clean, J. Clean. Prod. 181, 608e617 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos, & V. Leopoulos, Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of the construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Purvis, Y. Mao, D. Robinson, Three pillars for sustainability: search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science 14, 681e695 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Savitz, The triple bottom line: how today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success-and how you can too. John Wiley & Sons (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. Directive 2014/537/EU (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Thürer, I. Tomasevic, M. Stevenson, T. Qu, D. Huisingh, A systematic review of the literature on the integration of sustainability into engineering curricula. Clean, J. Clean. Prod. 181, 608e617 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. B.J. Kolltveit, J.T. Karlsen & K. Grønhaug, Perspectives on project management. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 3–9 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. The ABC for Sustainable Cities: A Glossary for Policy Maker. Available at https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/32537?show=full (2022) [Google Scholar]
  26. M.D. Popa, Al. Stanciulescu, G.F. Matei, A. Tudor, C. Zgavardici, R. Chiriacescu, Encyclopedic dictionary, Encyclopedic Publishing House, 1993–2009 (Marcel D. Popa, 1993–2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. I. Coteanu, L. Seche, M. Seche, DEX, The Romanian language explanatory dictionary (2nd edition revised and added), Romanian Academy, (Univers Enciclopedic, Bucharest, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  28. What is sustainable development? Available at https://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/policymaking/sustainable-development/ (2020) [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Keating, The Agenda of the Earth Summit for Change. Centre for our common future (1993) [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple-Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, (New Society Publishers, John Wiley & Son, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  31. M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos & V. Leopoulos, Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of the construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.T. Heinen, Emerging, Divergent, and Convergent Paradigms on Sustainable Development. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 1(1), 22–33 (1994) [Google Scholar]
  33. World Commission on Environment and Development, Brundtland Commission (Brundtland Commission, 1987). [Google Scholar]
  34. R. Camagni, Sustainable urban development: definition and reasons for a research programme. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 10(1), 6–27 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Sankaran, M. Jacobsson & T. Blomquist, The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework, Systems research and behavioral science (2021) [Google Scholar]
  36. D. Toljaga-Nikolić, M. Todorović, M. Dobrota, T. Obradović & V. Obradović, Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet, Sustainability, 12(20), 8619 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  37. G. Silvius, Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management, Journal of cleaner production, 166, 1479-1493 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  38. A.L. Müller & R. Pfleger, Business Transformation to Sustainability. Business Research, 7(2), 313–350 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. P. Lacy, T. Cooper, R. Hayward & L. Neuberger, A new era of sustainability, UN Global Compact, Accenture (2010) [Google Scholar]
  40. I. Oehlmann, The Sustainable Footprint Methodology: Including sustainability in the project management of the Bergermeer gas storage project (2010) [Google Scholar]
  41. Y.G. Schoper, H.G. Gemunden, N.M. Nguyen, Fifteen future trends for project management in 2025, In Future Trends in Project, Programme and Portofolio Management 2016, 23–43, International project Management association Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2016) [Google Scholar]
  42. W. Aarseth, T. Ahola, K. Aaltonen, A. Økland & B. Andersen, Project sustainability strategies: A systematic review of the literature, International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1071–1083 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  43. H. Taherdoost, How to lead to sustainable and successful IT project management? Propose a 5P guideline. Propose the 5Ps guideline (2018) [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Huemann & G. Silvius, Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1066–1070 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  45. E.A. Sholarin & J.L. Awange, Environmental project economics. In Environmental Project Management, 109–135, Springer, Cham. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  46. R. Turner & M. Huemann, Responsibilities for sustainable development in project and program management. In Proceedings of IPMA Expert Seminar February (2010) [Google Scholar]
  47. R. Maltzman & D. Shirley, Green project management. CRC Press (2010) [Google Scholar]
  48. S. Banihashemi, M.R. Hosseini, H. Golizadeh & S. Sankaran, Critical success factors (CSFs) for the integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. International Journal of project management, 35(6), 1103–1119 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  49. PMBOK. A Guide, Knowledge body of knowledge (pmbok® guide). In Project Management Institute, 11, 7–8 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  50. M.L. Martens & M.M. Carvalho, Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of project management, 35(6), 1084–1102 (2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.