Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2022
International Conference on Science and Technology 2022 “Advancing Science and Technology Innovation on Post Pandemic Through Society 5.0” (ICST-2022)
Article Number 04012
Number of page(s) 5
Section Design Technology and Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237204012
Published online 08 December 2022
  1. [D. E. Uwizeyimana, “Analysing the importance of e-government in times of disruption: The case of public education in Rwanda during Covid-19 lockdown,” Eval. Program Plann., vol. 91, p. 102064, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan. (2022).102064. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Nurdin, “Institutional Arrangements in EGovernment Implementation and Use: A Case Study From Indonesian Local Government,” Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 44–63, (2018), doi: http://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018040104. [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Martins and L. G. Veiga, “Digital government as a business facilitator,” Inf. Econ. Policy, vol. 60, p. 100990, (2022), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2022.100990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Venkatasen and P. Mani, “A risk-centric defensive architecture for threat modelling in egovernment application,” Electron. Gov. an Int. J., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–31, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Nasrullah, S. H. Suryawan, N. P. Istyanto, and T. Kristanto, “Risk Priority Analysis for Change Management on E-Government using RIPC4 and AHP,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–29, (2022). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. N. Aleksandrov, V. A. Vasiliev, and S. V Aleksandrova, “Implementation of the Risk-based Approach Methodology in Information Security Management Systems,” in (2021) International Conference on Quality Management, Transport and Information Security, Information Technologies (IT&QM&IS), 2021, pp. 137–139. doi: 10.1109/ITQMIS53292.2021.9642767. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Yasin, A. Akhmad Arman, I. J. M. Edward, and W. Shalannanda, “Designing Information Security Governance Recommendations and Roadmap Using COBIT 2019 Framework and ISO 27001: 2013(Case Study Ditreskrimsus Polda XYZ),” in (2020) 14th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA, 2020, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/TSSA51342.2020.9310875. [Google Scholar]
  8. G. M. W. Tangka, A. T. Liem, and J. Y. Mambu, “Information Technology Governance Audit Using the COBIT 5 Framework at XYZ University,” in 2020 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent System (ICORIS), (2020), pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICORIS50180.2020.9320803. [Google Scholar]
  9. et al. Bartens, Yannick, “Business/IT Alignment in Two-Sided Markets: A COBIT 5 Analysis for Media Streaming Business Models,” in Sustainable Business: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (4 Volumes), IGI Global, (2020), pp. 1123–1146. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9615-8.ch051. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yulandi, Y. Suryanto, and K. Ramli, “A COBITBased Critical Asset Evaluation of Electronic Certificate Management in Central, Urban, and Rural Government Agencies: Study and Analysis,” in (2018) International Conference on ICT for Rural Development (IC-ICTRuDev), (2018), pp. 98–104. doi: 10.1109/ICICTR.2018.8706851. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. R. Katili, V. Pateda, M. G. Djafri, and L. N. Amali, “Measuring the capability level of IT governance: a research study of COBIT 5 at Universitas Negeri Gorontalo,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1387, no. 1, p. 12021, (2019), doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012021. [Google Scholar]
  12. Imany, Y. D., N. Hayuhardhika, W., Putra, and A. D. Herlambang, “Evaluasi Tata Kelola Keamanan Informasi menggunakan COBIT 5 pada Domain APO13 dan DSS05 (Studi pada PT Gagas Energi Indonesia).,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 5926–5935, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  13. ISACA, “COBIT Self-assessment Guide: Using COBIT 5. In COBIT 5.” ISACA, (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.