Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2022
International Conference on Science and Technology 2022 “Advancing Science and Technology Innovation on Post Pandemic Through Society 5.0” (ICST-2022)
Article Number 04001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Design Technology and Information System
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237204001
Published online 08 December 2022
  1. M. M. Nadzir, N. Othman, and N. A. Binting, ““Factors Influencing Citizens” Engagement in E-GOVERNMENT 2.0,”“ J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 98, no. 02, pp. 245–255, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. L. We Are Social, ““Special Report Digital 2021,”“ (2021). https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2021/01/digital-2021-uk/. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Arief, D. I. Sensuse, L. A. Latif, and M. Yunus Abbas, ““Study on E-Government Integration: A Theoretical and Empirical Review,”“ IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1125, no. 1, p. 012028, (2021), doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1125/1/012028. [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Nindito, E. D. Madyatmadja, and A. V. Dian Sano, ““Evaluation of E-government services based on social media using structural equation modeling,”“ Proc. (2019) Int. Conf. Inf. Manag. Technol. ICIMTech 2019, vol. 2019-Augus, no. August, pp. 78–81, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2019.8843723. [Google Scholar]
  5. M. M. Ribeiro, M. A. Cunha, and A. F. Barbosa, ““E-participation, Social Media and Digital Gap: Challenges in the Brazilian Context,”“ 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (dg.o 2018). ACM, Delft, the Netherlands, p. [1-9], Oct. 16, (2018), doi: 10.1145/3209281.3209373. [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Kitchenham and P. Brereton, ““A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering,”“ Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 2049–2075, (2013), doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.010. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. P. Gupta and D. Jana, ““E-government evaluation: a framework and case study,”“ Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 365–387, (2003), [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W4G-4B6SK9R-4/2/52c2f579f2408a886c6896e9e9f50391. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. A. Chun and L. F. Luna Reyes, ““Social media in government,”“ Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 441–445, (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.003. [Google Scholar]
  9. E. D. Madyatmadja, E. Abdurachman, F. L. Gaol, B. W. Pudjianto, and M. Hapsara, ““Citizen recommendation for social mediabased government application development: A design science approach,”“ J. Comput. Sci., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1318–1328, (2018), doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2018.1318.1328. [Google Scholar]
  10. K. A. Vakeel and P. K. Panigrahi, ““Social media usage in E-government: Mediating role of government participation,”“ J. Glob. Inf. Manag., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–19, (2018), doi: 10.4018/JGIM.2018010101. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Picazo-Vela, I. Gutiérrez-Martínez, and L. F. Luna-Reyes, “Understanding risks, benefits, and strategic alternatives of social media applications in the public sector,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 504–511, (2012), doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2012.07.002. [Google Scholar]
  12. S. E. Jackson, A. Joshi, and N. L. Erhardt, ““Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications,”“ J. Manage., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 801–830, (2003), doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00080-1. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Hanafizadeh and A. Z. Ravasan, ““A McKinsey 7S model-based framework for ERP readiness assessment,”“ Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 23–63, (2011), doi: 10.4018/jeis.2011100103. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. ae Chun et al., ““Collaborative egovernment,”“ Transform. Gov. People, Process Policy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–12, (2012), doi: 10.1108/17506161211214868. [Google Scholar]
  15. T. Nam, ““Citizen Attitudes about Open Government and Government 2.0: A Path Analysis,”“ Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 46–66, May (2016), doi: 10.4018/IJEGR.2016100104. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. M. Liu and Y. Kim, ““Special issue on internet plus government: New opportunities to solve public problems?,”“ Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 88–97, (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.004. [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Oliveira and A. C. B. Garcia, ““Citizens” electronic participation: a systematic review of their challenges and how to overcome them,”“ Int. J. Web Based Communities, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 123–150, (2019), doi: 10.1504/IJWBC.2019.10020619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Robertson, ““Organizational culture and public diplomacy in the digital sphere: The case of South Korea,”“ Asia Pacific Policy Stud., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 672–682, (2018), doi: 10.1002/app5.256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Y. Lin, ““A comparison of selected Western and Chinese smart governance: The application of ICT in governmental management, participation and collaboration,”“ Telecomm. Policy, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 800–809, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.003. [Google Scholar]
  20. M. S. Adrees, O. E. Sheta, M. K. Omer, D. Stiawan, and R. Budiarto, ““A Framework of Promoting Government Services using Social Media: Sudan E-Government Case Study,”“ J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1167, no. 1, pp. 0–9, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1167/1/012062. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.