EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 370 (2022) MATEC Web Conf., 370 (2022) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 370, 2022
2022 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-CoSAAMI Conference - Digital Technology in Product Development - The 23rd Annual International RAPDASA Conference joined by RobMech, PRASA and CoSAAMI
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Design and Additive Manufacturing of Titanium Parts Seminar
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202237001001
Published online 01 December 2022
  1. T. T. Wohlers, I. Campbell, T. Caffrey, O. Diegel, and J. Kowen, “Wohlers Report 2018: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry: Annual World Wide Progress Report,” 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications, Fourth. New York: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. T. Tran, Q. Chen, J. Mohan, and A. C. To, “A new method for predicting cracking at the interface between solid and lattice support during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing,” Additive Manufacturing, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101050. [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Kumar, O. Prakash, and U. Ramamurty, “Micro-and meso-structures and their influence on mechanical properties of selectively laser melted Ti-6Al-4V,” Acta Materialia, vol. 154, pp. 246–260, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.044. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Cain, L. Thijs, J. van Humbeeck, B. van Hooreweder, and R. Knutsen, “Crack propagation and fracture toughness of Ti6Al4V alloy produced by selective laser melting,” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 5, pp. 68–76, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.ADDMA.2014.12.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. H. Becker, P. Kumar, and U. Ramamurty, “Fracture and fatigue in additively manufactured metals,” Acta Materialia, vol. 219, p. 117240, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.117240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Vrancken, V. Cain, R. Knutsen, and J. van Humbeeck, “Residual stress via the contour method in compact tension specimens produced via selective laser melting,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 87, pp. 29–32, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. H. Becker, N. M. Dhansay, G. M. ter Haar, and K. Vanmeensel, “Near-threshold fatigue crack growth rates of laser powder bed fusion produced Ti-Aal-4V,” Acta Materialia, vol. 197, pp. 269–282, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. P. O’Dowd, K. M. Nikbin, H. Y. Lee, R. C. Wimpory, and F. R. Biglari, “Stress intensity factors due to residual stresses in T-plate welds,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 126, no. 4, pp. 432–437, 2004, doi: 10.1115/1.1804199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Keller and V. Ploshikhin, “New method for fast predictions of residual stress and distortion of AM parts.” Accessed: Jul. 17, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6c4c/ad8045bdaac3d47b9c63ddef3a81c510d28a.pdf [Google Scholar]
  11. “ASTM E1820-01 Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness.” ASTM International, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  12. “ASTM F2924-4 Standard Specification for Additive Manufacturing Titanium-6 Aluminum-4 Vanadium with Powder Bed Fusion.” ASTM International, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Mercelis and J. Kruth, “Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 254–265, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1108/13552540610707013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. S. Anderson, A. M. Venter, B. Vrancken, D. Marais, J. van Humbeeck, and T. H. Becker, “Investigating the Residual Stress Distribution in Selective Laser Melting Produced Ti-6Al-4V using Neutron Diffraction,” Materials Research Forum LLC Materials Research Proceedings, vol. 4, pp. 73–78, 2017, doi: 10.21741/9781945291678-11. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.