Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 369, 2022
40th Annual Conference - Meeting of the Departments of Fluid Mechanics and Thermomechanics in the connection with XXIII. International Scientific Conference - The Application of Experimental and Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics and Energy (40th. MDFMT & XXIII. AEaNMiFMaE-2022)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 9 | |
| Section | Measurement and Calculation of State Variables in the Fluid Flow | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236901004 | |
| Published online | 04 November 2022 | |
- Luxa, M. (2017). Effects of the design of the last-stage rotor of the low-pressure part of the high-power steam turbine with very long blades on the transonic flow field, Habilitation Thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, (in Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Musil, J., Příhoda, J., Fürst, J. (2019). Simulation of supersonic flow through the tip-section turbine blade cascade with a flat profile, Proc. Conference Topical Problems of Fluid Mechanics 2019, Prague, 169-174, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14311/TPFM.2019.023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Luxa, M., Príhoda, J., Šimurda, D., Straka, P., Synáč, J. (2016). Investigation of the compressible flow through the tip-section turbine blade cascade with supersonic inlet, Journal of Thermal Science, 25, 2, s. 138-144, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-016-0844-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ligrani, P. M., McNabb, E. S., Collopy H., Anderson, M., Marko, S. M. (2020). Recent investigations of shock wave effects and interactions, Advances in Aerodynamics, 2, 4, 23 p., https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-020-0028-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T., Dolling, D. S. (2007). Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock-induced separation, Journal Fluid Mechanics, 585, 369-394, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112007006799 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Giepman, R. H. M., Schrijer, F. F. J., Oudheusden van, B. W. (2015). High-resolution PIV measurements of a transitional shock wave–boundary layer interaction, Experiments in Fluids, 56, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-015-1977-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Luxa, M., Šimurda, D., Hála, J. (2020). Measurements on TR-U-9 cascade, Institute of Thermomechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Research Report Z1610/2020 [Google Scholar]
- Menter, F. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for engineering applications, AIAA Journal, 32, 1598-1605, https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Langtry, R. B., Menter, F. R. (2009). Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes, AIAA Journal, 47, 2894-2906, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cutrone, L., De Palma, P., Pascazio, G., Napolitano, M. (2007). An evaluation of bypass transition models for turbomachinery flows, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 28, 161-177, http://doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2006.02.031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Louda, P., Straka, P., Příhoda, J. (2018). Simulation of transonic flows through a turbine blade cascade with various prescriptions of outlet boundary condition, EPJ Web of Conferences, 180, 02056, 6 p., https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201818002056 [Google Scholar]
- Louda, P., Příhoda, J. (2021). Study on the numerical model of transonic wind tunnel test section, Journal of Thermal Science, 30, 231-241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-020-1277-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.