EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 358 (2022) MATEC Web Conf., 358 (2022) 01068 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 358, 2022
3rd International Symposium on Mechanics, Structures and Materials Science (MSMS 2022)
Article Number 01068
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202235801068
Published online 19 May 2022
  1. FENG M, LU Y, YANG Y, et al. Bioinspired greigite magnetic nanocrystals: chemical synthesis and biomedicine applications [J]. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3(1). [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  2. ROBERTS A P, CHANG L, ROWAN C J, et al. Magnetic properties of sedimentary greigite (Fe3S4): An update [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2011, 49(1). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. WANG X, CAI W, WANG G, et al. One-step fabrication of high performance micro/nanostructured Fe3S4–C magnetic adsorbent with easy recovery and regeneration properties [J]. CrystEngComm, 2013, 15(15). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. ZHENG J, CAO Y, FU J-R, et al. Facile synthesis of magnetic Fe3S4 nanosheets and their application in lithium-ion storage [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2016, 668: 27–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. ARMAND M, AXMANN P, BRESSER D, et al. Lithium-ion batteries – Current state of the art and anticipated developments [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2020, 479. [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Mizushima, P. C. Jones, P. J. Wiseman, J. B. Goodenough, LixCoO2 A new cathode material for batteries of high energy density [J] Mater. Res. Bull 1980, 15, 783. [J]. [Google Scholar]
  7. Claude Delmas, Jean-Jacques Braconnier, et al. Electrochemical intercalation of sodium in NaxCoO2 bronzes[J]. Solid State Ionics,1981, 3(4): 165–169. [J]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. LIU T, ZHANG Y, JIANG Z, et al. Exploring competitive features of stationary sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2019, 12(5): 1512–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. TAPIA-RUIZ N, ARMSTRONG A R, ALPTEKIN H, et al. 2021 roadmap for sodium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Physics: Energy, 2021, 3(3). [Google Scholar]
  10. PALOMARES V, CASAS-CABANAS M, CASTILLO-MARTïNEZ E, et al. Update on Nabased battery materials. A growing research path [J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2013, 6(8). [Google Scholar]
  11. LAN T, MA Q, TSAI C L, et al. Ionic Conductivity of Na3V2P3O12 as a Function of Electrochemical Potential and its Impact on Battery Performance [J]. Batteries & Supercaps, 2020, 4(3): 479–84. [Google Scholar]
  12. ZHOU P, LIU X, WENG J, et al. Synthesis, structure, and electrochemical properties of O′3-type monoclinic NaNi0.8Co0.15Al0.05O2 cathode materials for sodium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2019, 7(2): 657–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. YE L, WANG W, ZHANG B, et al. Regeneration of well-performed anode material for sodium ion battery from waste lithium cobalt oxide via a facile sulfuration process [J]. Materials Today Energy, 2022, 25. [Google Scholar]
  14. MWIZERWA J P, ZHANG Q, HAN F, et al. Sulfur- Embedded FeS2 as a High-Performance Cathode for Room Temperature All-Solid-State Lithium-Sulfur Batteries [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2020, 12(16): 18519–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. SHEN Y, ZHANG Q, WANG Y, et al. A Pyrite Iron Disulfide Cathode with a Copper Current Collector for High-Energy Reversible Magnesium-Ion Storage [J]. Adv Mater, 2021: e2103881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. WU J, LIANG Y, BAI P, et al. Microwave-assisted synthesis of pyrite FeS2 microspheres with strong absorption performance [J]. RSC Advances, 2015, 5(80): 65575–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. ZHANG S S. The redox mechanism of FeS2 in nonaqueous electrolytes for lithium and sodium batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2015, 3(15): 7689–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. WANG W, LI W, WANG S, et al. Structural design of anode materials for sodium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2018, 6(15): 6183–205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. LIU Q, HU Z, ZOU C, et al. Structural engineering of electrode materials to boost high-performance sodium-ion batteries [J]. Cell Reports Physical Science, 2021, 2(9). [Google Scholar]
  20. WANG L, LIU B, ZHU Y, et al. General metalorganic framework-derived strategy to synthesize yolk-shell carbon-encapsulated nickelic spheres for sodium-ion batteries [J]. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2022, 613: 23–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. LI Q, WEI Q, ZUO W, et al. Greigite Fe3S4 as a new anode material for high-performance sodium-ion batteries [J]. Chem Sci, 2017, 8(1): 160–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. WANG Z, ZHANG Y, PENG H, et al. Engineering kinetics-favorable 2D graphene@CuS with longterm cycling stability for rechargeable magnesium batteries [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2022, 407. [Google Scholar]
  23. KANDULA S, BAE J, CHO J, et al. Gram-scale synthesis of rGO wrapped porous α-Fe2O3 as an advanced anode material for Na-ion batteries with superior cyclic stability [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2021, 220. [Google Scholar]
  24. WU C, ZHENG J, LI J, et al. Fe3S4@reduced graphene oxide composites as novel anode materials for high performance alkaline secondary batteries [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 895. [Google Scholar]
  25. FENG C, ZHANG L, YANG M, et al. One-Pot Synthesis of Copper Sulfide Nanowires/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposites with Excellent Lithium-Storage Properties as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7(29): 15726–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hummers, W. S.; Offeman, R. E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339−1339. [J]. [Google Scholar]
  27. LUO J, HU Y, XIAO L, et al. Synthesis of 3D flowerlike Fe3S4 microspheres and quasi-sphere Fe3S4- RGO hybrid-architectures with enhanced electromagnetic wave absorption [J]. Nanotechnology, 2019, 31(8): 085708. [Google Scholar]
  28. XU Q-T, LI J-C, XUE H-G, et al. Effective combination of FeS2 microspheres and Fe3S4 microcubes with rGO as anode material for highcapacity and long-cycle lithium-ion batteries [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 396: 675–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. FU Z, JIANG T, LIU Z, et al. Highly photoactive Tidoped α-Fe2O3 nanorod arrays photoanode prepared by a hydrothermal method for photoelectrochemical water splitting [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 129: 358–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. XIA J, JIAO J, DAI B, et al. Facile synthesis of FeS2 nanocrystals and their magnetic and electrochemical properties [J]. RSC Advances, 2013, 3(17). [Google Scholar]
  31. XIE D, CAI S, SUN X, et al. FeS/ZnS nanoflower composites as high performance anode materials for sodium ion batteries [J]. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 2020, 111. [Google Scholar]
  32. HEIFT D. Iron Sulfide Materials: Catalysts for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution [J]. Inorganics, 2019, 7(6). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. GUO S P, LI J C, XIAO J R, et al. Fe3S4 Nanoparticles Wrapped in an rGO Matrix for Promising Energy Storage: Outstanding Cyclic and Rate Performance [J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2017, 9 (43): 37694–701. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. ZHANG S, LI H, WANG Z, et al. A strongly coupled Au/Fe3O4/GO hybrid material with enhanced nanozyme activity for highly sensitive colorimetric detection, and rapid and efficient removal of Hg(2+) in aqueous solutions [J]. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(18): 8495–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. ZHANG W-M, WU X-L, HU J-S, et al. Carbon Coated Fe3O4Nanospindles as a Superior Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2008, 18(24): 3941–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. CABANA J, MONCONDUIT L, LARCHER D, et al. Beyond intercalation-based Li-ion batteries: the state of the art and challenges of electrode materials reacting through conversion reactions [J]. Adv Mater, 2010, 22(35): E170–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.