EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 337 (2021) MATEC Web Conf., 337 (2021) 03018 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 337, 2021
PanAm-Unsat 2021: 3rd Pan-American Conference on Unsaturated Soils
Article Number 03018
Number of page(s) 7
Section Slopes, Embankments, Roads, and Foundations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202133703018
Published online 26 April 2021
  1. J.G. Zornberg & J.K. Mitchell. (1994). Reinforced soil structures with poorly draining backfills, Part I. Geosynthetics International, 1 (2), pp. 103–148. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.1.0006 [Google Scholar]
  2. R. M. Koerner, and T. Y. Soong, (2001). Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Walls. Geotextextiles and. Geomembranes, Vol 19, No. 6, pp. 359–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(01) 00012-7 [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Yoo, & H. Y Jung. (2006). Case History of Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Wall Failure. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., Vol. 132, No. 12, pp. 1538–1548. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:12(1538) [Google Scholar]
  4. F.H.M. Portelinha & J. G. Zornberg (2017). Effect of Infiltration on the Performance of an Unsaturated Geotextile-Reinforced Soil Wall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 45, No. 3, pp. 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. A. S. Carvalho, J. A. B. A. Pedrosa, C. M. Wolle. (1986). Geotextile reinforced embankment – an alternative to geotechnical engineering. Proceedings of Brazilian Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations, 8, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, October 1986, pp. 169–178 (in Portuguese). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. K. Mitchell, J. G. Zornberg. (1995). Reinforced Soil Structures with Poorly Draining Backfills, Part II: Case Histories and Applications. Geosynthetics International, 2 (1), pp. 265-307. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2.0011 [Google Scholar]
  7. F. H. M. Portelinha, B. S. Bueno, J. G. Zornberg. (2013). Performance of nonwoven geotextile reinforced soil walls under wetting conditions : laboratory and field investigation. Geosynthetics International, 20 (2), pp. 90-104. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.13.00004 [Google Scholar]
  8. F. H. M. Portelinha, J. G. Zornberg, V. Pimentel. (2014). Field Performance of retaining walls reinforced with woven and nonwoven geotextiles. Geosynthetics International, 21 (4), p. 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.14.00014 [Google Scholar]
  9. J. G. Zornberg, A. Bouazza, J. S. McCartney. (2010). Geosynthetic capillary barriers: current state of knowledge. Geosynthetics International, v. 17, n. 5, p. 273-300. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2010.17.5.273 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Khire, C. Benson, P. Bosscher. (2000). Capillary barriers in semiarid and arid climates: design variables and the water balance. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 126, No. 8, 695–708.https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:8(695) [Google Scholar]
  11. D.G. Fredlund, N.R. Morgernstern (1977). Stress state variables for unsaturated soils. ASCE J. Geotech. Engng Div. 103 (No. GT5), pp. 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000423 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. G. Fredlund, N. R. Morgentern, R. A. Widger. (1978). The shear strength of unsaturated soils. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, V. 15, No. 3, pp. 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-029 [Google Scholar]
  13. S.K. Vanapalli, D.G. Fredlund, M.D. Pufahl, A.W. Clifton. (1996). Model for prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Can. Geotechnical J. 33 (3), pp. 379-392. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-060 [Google Scholar]
  14. N. Khalali, M.H. Khabbaz, (1998). A unique relationship for shear strength determination of unsaturated soils. Geotechnique 48 (No. 5), p. 681-688. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1998.48.5.681 [Google Scholar]
  15. E.A.M. Marinho, R.J. Chandle, M.S. Crilly (1995). Stiffness measurements on an unsaturated high plasticity clay using bender elements. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. On Unsaturated Soils, vol. 2, pp. 535-539. Paris. [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Mancuso, R. Vassallo, A. d’Onofrio (2002). Small strain behavior of a silty sand in controlled-suction resonant column e torsional shear tests. Can. Geotech. J. 39 (No. 1), pp. 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1139/t01-076 [Google Scholar]
  17. C.W.W. Ng, S.Y. Yung. (2008). Determination of the anisotropic shear stifness of an unsaturated decomposed soil. Geotechnique 58, pp. 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.58.1.23 [Google Scholar]
  18. C.W.W. Ng, J. Xu, (2012). Effects of current suction ratio and recent suction history on small-strain behaviour of an unsaturated soil. Can. Geotechnical J. 49, pp. 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1139/t11-097 [Google Scholar]
  19. G. B. Georgetti, O.M. Vilar, R. A. Rodrigues, (2013). Small-strain shear modulus and shear strength of an unsaturated clayey sand. In: 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, Paris. Proceedings.... Paris : Presses des Ponts, 2013. v. 1. p. 1113-1116. [Google Scholar]
  20. M.Th. van Genuchten (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, pp. 892-898. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Mualem, (1976). A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 12, pp. 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR012i003p00513 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.