Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 313, 2020
Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering – DYN-WIND’2020
Article Number 00039
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 16 April 2020
  1. J. Provis, J. Deventer, Alkali Activated Materials: State-of-the-Art Report, RILEM TC 224-AAM. (Springer/RILEM, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Palacios, F. Puertas, Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 1358-1367 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Shi, D. Roy, P. Krivenko, Alkali-activated cements and concretes (Taylor & Francis, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Plskova, L. Topolar, et al., Advances and Trends in Engineering Sciences and Technologies III (217–222, CRC Press/Balkema, Netherlands, 2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Burciaga-Díaz, I. Escalante-Garcia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96, 3939-3948 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. S. Gebregziabiher, R. Thomas, S. Peethamparan, Cem. Concr. Compos. 55, 91-102 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Wang, K. L. Scrivener, Cem. Concr. Compos. 25, 561-571 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Puertas, M. Palacios, H. Manzano, J.S. Dolado, A. Rico, J. Rodríguez, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 31, 2043-2056 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Matysik, I. Plskova, Z. Chobola, Mater. Tehnol. 49, 639-643 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. S. A. Bernal, J. L. Provis, R. J. Myers et al., Mater. Struct. 48, 517–529 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Ben Haha, G. Le Saout, F. Winnefeld, B. Lothenbach, Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 301-310 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Timcakova-Samarkova, M. Matysik, Z. Chobola, Mater. Tehnol. 50, 565-570 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Bilim, O. Karahan, C. D. Atiş, S. İlkentapar, Mater. Des. 44, 540-547 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Parra, M. Valcuende, F. Gómez, Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 201-207 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K.K. Sideris, P. Manita, K. Sideris, Cem. Concr. Compos. 26, 623-631 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Matysik, I. Plskova, Z. Chobola, Mater. Tehnol. 49, 639-643 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. O. Gade, B. B. Alaca, M.G.R. Sause, J. Nondestr. Eval. 36 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Hajek, J. Sikula, AIP Conference Proceedings 1022, (American Institute of Physics, 525–528, 2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. N. Carino, The Impact-Echo Method: An Overview (National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Stoudek, T. Trcka et al., Mater. Tehnol. 50, 547-552 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Majhi, A. Mukherjee, N. V. George, B. Uy, NDT E Int. 107 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. H. Ye, A. Radlińska, Cem. Concr. Res. 88, 126-135 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.