Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 310, 2020
4th International Scientific Conference Structural and Physical Aspects of Construction Engineering (SPACE 2019)
Article Number 00016
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 05 March 2020
  1. Y. Xiang, Y. Liu, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics. 26 148–156 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. X.W. Ye, Y.H. Su, J.P. Han, Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2014 1–13 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Vičan, J. Gocál, J. Odrobiňák, P. Koteš, Procedia Engineering. 156 507–514 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A.F. Hobbacher, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Advances in Welding Science and Technology for Construction, Energy and Transportation, AWST 2010 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Kühn, M. Lukić, A. Nussbaumer, H. Günther, R. Helmerich, R. Herion, M. Kolstein, S. Walbridge, B. Androic, O. Dijkstra, Ö. Bucak, Steel Construction. 1 94–95 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. B. Åkesson, Fatigue life of riveted steel bridges, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. EN 1993-1-1, CEN. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. EN 1991-3 July, Eurocode 1 Actions on structures Part 3: Actions induced by cranes and machinery Eurocode, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  9. B.E. 1993-1-3:2009, Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures Part 1-9: Fatigue. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. S.B. Hashemi, J. Maljaars, H.H. Snijder, Safety and Reliability Safe Societies in a Changing World (2018): pp. 2339–2345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A.J. Sadowski, J.M. Rotter, T. Reinke, T. Ummenhofer, Structural Safety. 53 26–35 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Zhang, S. Mahadevan, Journal of Structural Engineering. 127 957–965 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Lehner, M. Krejsa, P. Pařenica, V. Křivý, J. Brožovský, International Journal of Fatigue. 128 105190 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Lehner, V. Křivý, M. Krejsa, P. Pařenica, J. Kozák, Stochastic Service Life Prediction of Existing Steel Structure Loaded by Overhead Cranes, in: Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier, (2018): pp. 1539–1544. [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Kühn, Procedia Engineering. 66 3–11 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M.A. Torres, S.E. Ruiz, Engineering Structures. 29 2183–2192 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Z. Kala, Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 15 1098–1107 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Ghosh, P. Konečný, P. Lehner, P.J. Tikalsky, Computers and Concrete. 19 305–313 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Králik, Procedia Engineering. 190 472–479 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Przekop, S.A. Rizzi, Computers and Structures. 84 1606–1618 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Casciati, C. Fuggini, Smart Structures and Systems. 7 349–363 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. W. Punurai, P. Davis, Engineering Journal. 21 1–13 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Metropolis, S. Ulam, Journal of the American Statistical Association. 44 335 (1949). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Seitl, P. Miarka, P. Janosik, Modelling in Mechanics (2019). [Google Scholar]
  25. Scia Engineering, Online Dokumentation. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  26. C. Amzallag, J.P. Gerey, J.L. Robert, J. Bahuaud, International Journal of Fatigue. 16 287–293 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. ANSYS, ANSYS User Guide. 15317 514 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Seitl, P. Miarka, P. Pokorny, L. Kunz, Transactions of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series, (In Press). (2019). [Google Scholar]
  29. Z. Hashin, Journal of Applied Mechanics. 47 324–328 (1980). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. E.W.C. Wilkins, Colloquium on Fatigue / Colloque de Fatigue / Kolloquium Über Ermüdungsfestigkeit, (1956): pp. 321–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S. Kwofie, N. Rahbar, International Journal of Damage Mechanics. (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.