Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 306, 2020
The 6th International Conference on Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering (ICMME 2019)
Article Number 05005
Number of page(s) 5
Section Aerospace Engineering
Published online 14 January 2020
  1. Zhang, S., Y. Sunami, and H. Hashimoto, Deformation behavior of dragonfly-inspired nodus structured wing in gliding flight through experimental visualization approach. Scientific Reports, 2018. 8(1): p. 5751. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shyy, W., et al., Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Science, 2016. 472(2186): p. 20150712. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hord, K. and Y. Liang, Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic and Structural Characteristics of a Corrugated Airfoil. Journal of Aircraft, 2012. 49(3): p. 5–101. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rees, C.J.C., Aerodynamic properties of an insect wing section and a smooth aerofoil compared. Nature, 1975. 258(5531): p. 141-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Newman, B.G., S.B. Savage, and D. Schonella, Model tests on a wing section of an Aeschna dragonfly, in Scale effect in animal locomotion, T.J. Pedley, Editor. 1977. p. 445-477. [Google Scholar]
  6. Rudolph, R., Aerodynamic properties of Libellula quadrimaculata L. (Anisoptera: Libellulidae), and the flow around smooth and corrugated wing section models during gliding flight. Odonatologica, 1978. 7(1): p. 49-58. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kesel, A.B., Aerodynamic characteristics of dragonfly wing sections compared with technical aerofoils. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2000. 203(Pt 20): p. 3125-35. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hu, H. and M. Tamai, Bioinspired Corrugated Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers. Journal of Aircraft, 2008. 45(6): p. 2068-2077. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Levy, D.-E. and A. Seifert, Simplified dragonfly airfoil aerodynamics at Reynolds numbers below 8000. Physics of Fluids, 2009. 21(7): p. 071901. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Y.H. and M. Skote, Gliding performance of 3-D corrugated dragonfly wing with spanwise variation. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2016. 62: p. 1-13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bomphrey, R.J., et al., Flight of the dragonflies and damselflies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2016. 371(1704): p. 20150389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo, G. and M. Sun, The effects of corrugation and wing planform on the aerodynamic force production of sweeping model insect wings. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2005. 21(6): p. 531-541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Meng, X.G., L. Xu, and M. Sun, Aerodynamic effects of corrugation in flapping insect wings in hovering flight. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2011. 214(3): p. 432-444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Flint, T., et al., Validated Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of an Oscillating Bio- Inspired Airfoil. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2015. 799-800: p. 698-706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, Z., et al., Artificial insect wings with biomimetic wing morphology and mechanical properties. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2017. 12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, Y.J., et al., A quasi-steady aerodynamic model for flapping flight with improved adaptability. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2016. 11(3): p. 036005. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lua, K.B., T.T. Lim, and K.S. Yeo, Scaling of Aerodynamic Forces of Three-Dimensional Flapping Wings. AIAA Journal, 2014. 52(5): p. 1095-1101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, Y.J. and K.B. Lua, Wing–wake interaction: comparison of 2D and 3D flapping wings in hover flight. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2018. 13(6): p. 066003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun, M. and J. Tang, Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2002. 205(Pt 1): p. 55-70. [Google Scholar]
  20. New, T.H., et al., Effects of Corrugated Aerofoil Surface Features on Flow-Separation Control. AIAA Journal, 2013. 52(1): p. 206-211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.