Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 304, 2019
9th EASN International Conference on “Innovation in Aviation & Space”
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 8
Section Aerostructures & Manufacturing
Published online 17 December 2019
  1. Cantwell WJ, Morton J. Comparison of the low and high velocity impact response of cfrp. Composites 1989;20:545–51.doi:10.1016/0010-4361(89)90913-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. López-Puente J, Zaera R, Navarro C. Experimental and numerical analysis of normal and oblique ballistic impacts on thin carbon/epoxy woven laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 2008;39:374–87. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Yen C-F. 7 th International LS-DYNA Users Conference Penetration/Explosive BALLISTIC IMPACT MODELING OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS n.d.:15–26. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chamis CC, Abdi F, Garg M, Minnetyan L, Baid H, Huang D, et al. Micromechanics-based progressive failure analysis prediction for WWFE-III composite coupon test cases. J Compos Mater 2013;47:2695–712. doi:10.1177/0021998313499478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerlach R, Siviour CR, Petrinic N, Wiegand J. Experimental characterisation and constitutive modelling of RTM-6 resin under impact loading. Polymer (Guildf) 2008;49:2728–37. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.