Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2019
International Conference on Built Environment and Engineering 2018 - “Enhancing Construction Industry Through IR4.0” (IConBEE2018)
Article Number 01003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Sustainable Construction and Built Environment (SCBE)
Published online 20 February 2019
  1. CIDB. Construction Industry Transformation Plan (CITP) 2016-2020. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Low, S.P., S. Gao, and Y.L. See, Strategies and measures for implementing eco-labelling schemes in Singapore’s construction industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2014. 89(0): p. 31–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Udawatta, N., J. Zuo, K. Chiveralls, and G. Zillante, Improving waste management in construction projects: An Australian study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015. 101(0): p. 73–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kiser, B., CIRCULAR ECONOMY Getting the circulation going. Nature, 2016. 531(7595): p. 443–444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Qian, G. and C. Wang, Circular Economy Cities, in China’s Eco-city Construction. 2016, Springer. p. 169-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cahalane, C. Construction industry needs a circular economy for a sustainable future. 2014 [cited 2014 20 November]; Available from: [Google Scholar]
  7. Dajian, Z., Towards a Closed-Loop Materials Economy. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 2004. 2(1): p. 9–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Akhir, N.S.M., I.A. Rahman, A.H. Memon, and S. Nagapan. Factors of Waste Generation throughout Construction Life Cycle. in Malaysian Technical Universities Conference on Engineering & Technology (MUCET). 2013. Kuantan, Pahang. [Google Scholar]
  9. Esa, M.R., A. Halog, and L. Rigamonti, Strategies for minimizing construction and demolition wastes in Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017. 120. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gangolells, M., M. Casals, N. Forcada, and M. Macarulla, Analysis of the implementation of effective waste management practices in construction projects and sites. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2014. 93(0): p. 99–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lachimpadi, S.K., J.J. Pereira, M.R. Taha, and M. Mokhtar, Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction (Mixed System and IBS) methods in high-rise buildings: A Malaysia case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2012. 68: p. 96–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Arif, M., D. Bendi, T. Toma-Sabbagh, and M. Sutrisna, Construction waste management in India: an exploratory study. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 2012. 12(2): p. 133–155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, J.Y., X.P. Kang, and V. Wing-Yan Tam, An investigation of construction wastes: an empirical study in Shenzhen. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 2008. 6(3): p. 227–236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, S. Determining Sample Size: How to Ensure You Get the Correct Sample Size. 2013 [cited 2016 18 August 2016]; Available from: [Google Scholar]
  15. Hao, J.L., M.J. Hills, and T. Huang, A simulation model using system dynamic method for construction and demolition waste management in Hong Kong. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 2007. 7(1): p. 7–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jian Li H., M.J. Hill, and S. Li Yin, Managing construction waste on-site through system dynamics modelling: the case of Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2008. 15(2): p. 103–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kulatunga, U., D. Amaratunga, R. Haigh, and R. Rameezdeen, Attitudes and perceptions of construction workforce on construction waste in Sri Lanka. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 2006. 17(1): p. 57–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.