Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 05027
Number of page(s) 11
Section Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Structures in Severe Environment, Structural Analysis
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. R D Bertero, V V Bertero, Performance Based Seismic Engineering: Development and Application of a Comprehensive Conceptual Approach to Design of Building, Chapter 8 of Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology to Performance Based Engineering, CRC Press, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  2. M Bagheri, M Miri, Performance based design in earthquake engineering, 5th International Congress in Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Marshad, Iran, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  3. H Hastemoglu, Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced concrete frames, IOSR J. Mech. and Civil Eng., Vol. 12, Issue 5, 2015, pp.123–131. [Google Scholar]
  4. M Zameeruddin, K K Sangle, Review on Recent Developments in the Performance Based Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures. Structures, Vol. 6, (2016), pp.119–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M Zameerudin, K K Single, Seismic Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Using NonLinear Static Analyses, J. Civil Eng., 21(4), (2017), pp.1319–1330. [Google Scholar]
  6. M Rodriguez, A measure of the capacity of earthquake ground motions to damage structures, J. Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. (EESD), Vol. 23, No.5, (1994), pp.627–643. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H B Ozmen, M Inel, Damage potential of earthquake records for RC building Stocks, J. Earthq. and Struct., Vol.10, No.6, (2016), pp.1315–1330. [Google Scholar]
  8. L Danciu, Development of a system to assess the earthquake damage potential for buildings: Intensiometers, PhD Thesis University of Patras, Greece, (2006), 253p. [Google Scholar]
  9. H Sucuoglu, A Nurtug, Earthquake ground motion characteristics and seismic energy dissipations, J. Earthq. Eng. and Struct. Dyn. (EESD), Vol. 25, (1995), pp. 1195–1213. [Google Scholar]
  10. A Elenas, Seismic-Parameter-Based Statistical Procedures for the Approximate Assessment of Structural Damage, Mathematical Problem in Engineering Research Article, (2014), 22p. [Google Scholar]
  11. N Buratti, A Comparison of the performances of various ground motion intensity measures, The 15th Worlrd Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  12. Y Cheng, Intensity measures for seismic response prediction and associated ground motion selection and modification, Doctorate Dissertation, Department of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, Sapienza University of Rome, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  13. C Doniga, Performance Based Designed-State of the Art, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Sciences, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  14. H Jiang, B Fu, L Chen, Damage control Seismic Design Of Moment Resisting Frame Buildings, J. Asian Arch. and Eng. Build., Vol. 12, No.1, (2013), p.49–56 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A Bagchi, Evaluation of the seismic performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, PhD Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, (2001), 257 p. [Google Scholar]
  16. R Sinha, S R Shiradhonkar, Seismic damage index for classification of structural damage-closing the loop, The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  17. Y J Park, Ang A H S, Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete, J. Struct. Eng. Div. ASCE, Vol. 111, No.4, (1995), pp.722–739 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. SNI 1726, Tata cara perencanaan ketahanan gempa untuk bangunan gedung dan non gedung, Badan Standarisasi Nasional, (2002), 138p. [Google Scholar]
  19. SNI 2847, Persyaratan beton structural untuk bangunan gedung, Badan Standarisasi Nasional, (2013), p. 255 [Google Scholar]
  20. W K Tso, T J Zhu, A C Heidebrecht, Engineering implication of ground motion A/V ratio, J. Soil Dyn. and Earthg. Eng., 11, (1992) pp.133–144 [Google Scholar]
  21. A J Carr, Ruaumoko Program Library, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  22. Pavlenko, “Physical mechanism of high peak ground acceleration (> 1g) in strong ground motion (Tohuku earthquake of March 11, 2011 as an example)”, The 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul Turkey, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. T Furumura T, S Takemura, S Noguchi, T Takemoto, T Maeda, K Iwai, S Padhy, Strong Ground Motion from the 2011 off-the Pacific Coast - of-Tohuku, Japan (Mw9.0) earthquake obtained from a dense nationwide seismic networks, Landslides, 8, (2011), pp.333–338. [Google Scholar]
  24. V V Bertero, The Seismological and Engineering aspects of the January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of Berkeley, California, Report No:UBC/EERC/95/10, 250p. [Google Scholar]
  25. B Bradley, 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake: Are we adequately characterizing extreme/rare events?, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch New Zealand, (2011), [Google Scholar]
  26. A Ghobarah, On drift limits associated with different damage levels, Department of Civil Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  27. A Ghobarah, Performance based design in earthquake engineering: State of the development, Engineering Structures, 23, (2001), pp.878–884 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.