EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 252 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 252 (2019) 07010 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 252, 2019
III International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’18)
Article Number 07010
Number of page(s) 5
Section Finite Element Method (FEM)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925207010
Published online 14 January 2019
  1. F.C. Cambell, Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials (Elsevier, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. Z.P. Bazant, L. Cedolin, Stability of structures. Elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories (Oxford University Press, 1991) [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Falkowicz, ACE, 63,4, 161-172 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Banat, R.J. Mania, Thin Wall Struct., 122, 52-63 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Banat, R.J. Mania, Compos Part B Eng. 112, 278-289 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Wysmulski, A. Teter, H. Debski, AIP Conference Proceedings 1922, 080008 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Rozylo, Archives of Material Science and Engineering 84, 58-64 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. http://tomprofil.eu/index.php/zetownik-perforwany [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Rozylo, H. Debski, P. Wysmulski, K. Falkowicz, Compos. Struct. 204, 207-216 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Kołakowski, A. Teter, Compos Struct, 129, 1-7 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Kopecki, P. Mazurek, JTAM 51, 4, 969–977 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Falkowicz, H. Debski, A. Teter, AIP Conference Proceedings 1922, 080004 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Narayanan, F.Y. Chow, Thin Wall Struct, 2, 2, 241-264 (1984) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Ouinas, B. Achour, Comp. Part B 55, 575-579 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. K. Dinesh, S.B. Singh, Compos. Struct. 92, 769-779 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Abaqus HTML Documentation [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Rusinski, J. Czmochowski, T. Smolnicki, Advanced Finite Element Method in stability construction (Wroclaw University of Technology Press (in Polish, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Gajewski, P. Golewski, and T. Sadowski, Compos. Struct, 159, 589–599 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Gajewski and T. Sadowski, Comput. Mater. Sci., 82, 114–117 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Karpinski, L. Jaworski, M. Szala, M. Manko, ITM Web of Conferences 15, 07006 (2017) [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Karpinski, L. Jaworski, J. Zubrzycki, Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J. 10, 31, 240-246 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. N. Kepczak, W. Pawlowski, L. Kaczmarek, Arch Metall Mater, 60, 2 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Fedorko, V. Ivanco, Procedia Engineering 48, 123-128 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. G. Fedorko, V. Molnar, ASTRJ 11, 2, 220-225 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  25. http://kbhakord.pl/pl/stal-informator-techniczny [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Dębski, T. Kubiak, A. Teter, Compos Struct 100, 195-204 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.