Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 252, 2019
III International Conference of Computational Methods in Engineering Science (CMES’18)
Article Number 03021
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computational Artificial Intelligence
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925203021
Published online 14 January 2019
  1. A. T. Duchowski, Behav. Res. Methods, Instruments, Comput. 34, 455–470 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. M. Bradley, L. Miccoli, M. A. Escrig, P. J. Lang, Psychophysiology. 45, 602–607 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Granholm, S. R. Steinhauer, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 52, 1–6 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. J. Lang, M. K. Greenwald, M. M. Bradley, A. O. Hamm, Psychophysiology. 30, 261–273 (1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Partala, M. Jokiniemi, V. Surakka, in Proceedings of the 2000 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications (ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2000; http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/355017.355042), ETRA ’00, pp. 123–129 [Google Scholar]
  6. S. R. Steinhauer, G. J. Siegle, R. Condray, M. Pless, Int. J. Psychophysiol. 52, 77–86 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Beatty, B. Lucero-Wagoner, others, Handb. Psychophysiol. 2 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Park, L. Knörzer, J. L. Plass, R. Brünken, Comput. Educ. 86, 30–42 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Husić-Mehmedović, I. Omeragić, Z. Batagelj, T. Kolar, J. Bus. Res. 80, 145–154 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Wiebe, A. Kersting, T. Suslow, J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry. 55, 1–5 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. R. Bardeen, T. A. Daniel, Cognit. Ther. Res. 41, 853–866 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. R. R. Henderson, M. M. Bradley, P. J. Lang, Psychophysiology. 55, e13050 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Ferrari, A. De Cesarei, S. Mastria, L. Lugli, G. Baroni, R. Nicoletti, M. Codispoti, Biol. Psychol. 113, 75–82 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. J. Snowden, K. R. O’Farrell, D. Burley, J. T. Erichsen, N. V Newton, N. S. Gray, Psychophysiology. 53, 1217–1223 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Coyne, C. Sibley, Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 60, 37–41 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. V. L. Kinner, L. Kuchinke, A. M. Dierolf, C. J. Merz, T. Otto, O. T. Wolf, Psychophysiology. 54, 508–518 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. M. Bradley, P. J. Lang, Psychophysiology. 52, 1186–1193 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. E. H. HESS, J. M. POLT, Science. 132, 349–350 (1960) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Lanata, A. Armato, G. Valenza, E. P. Scilingo, Proc. 5th Int. ICST Conf. Pervasive Comput. Technol. Healthc., 78–84 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Alghowinem, M. AlShehri, R. Goecke, M. Wagner, in Intelligent Systems for Science and Information: Extended and Selected Results from the Science and Information Conference 2013, L. Chen, S. Kapoor, R. Bhatia, Eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04702-7_15), pp. 261–276 [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Jaques, C. Conati, J. M. Harley, R. Azevedo, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, S. Trausan-Matu, K. E. Boyer, M. Crosby, K. Panourgia, Eds. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2014), pp. 29–38 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Y. Hou, T. Xiao, S. Zhang, X. Jiang, X. Li, X. Hu, J. Han, L. Guo, L. S. Miller, R. Neupert, T. Liu, IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 7, 29–44 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tobii Technology AB, User Manual Tobii Studio (2014; www.tobii.com) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. L. Merritt, A. P. Keegan, P. W. Mercer, Nurs. Res. 43, 56–59 (1994) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. O. Bergamin, R. H. Kardon, Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 44, 1546 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Cardona, N. Quevedo, Curr. Eye Res. 39, 239–244 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.