Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 232, 2018
2018 2nd International Conference on Electronic Information Technology and Computer Engineering (EITCE 2018)
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 6
Section Network Security System, Neural Network and Data Information
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823201037
Published online 19 November 2018
  1. Zhang, R., Tang, C., Hu, Y. C., Fahmy, S., & Lin, X. (2006, April). Impact of the inaccuracy of distance prediction algorithms on internet applications-an analytical and comparative study. In INFOCOM 2006. 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings (pp. 1-12) IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lua, E. K., Zhou, X., Crowcroft, J., & Van Mieghem, P. (2008). Scalable multicasting with network-aware geometric overlay. Computer Communications, 31(3), 464-488. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhao, B. Y., Huang, L., Stribling, J., Rhea, S. C., Joseph, A. D., & Kubiatowicz, J. D. (2004). Tapestry: A resilient global-scale overlay for service deployment. IEEE Journal on selected areas in communications, 22(1), 41-53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lian, Q., Zhang, Z., Yang, M., Zhao, B. Y., Dai, Y., & Li, X. (2007, June). An empirical study of collusion behavior in the Maze P2P file-sharing system. In Distributed Computing Systems, 2007. ICDCS’07. 27th International Conference on (pp. 56-56). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  5. Komosny D, Simek M, Kathiravelu G. (2013) . Can Vivaldi Help in IP Geolocation?. Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, 2013, 89(5): 100-106. [Google Scholar]
  6. Moravek, P., Komosny, D., Burget, R., Sveda, J., Handl, T., & Jarosova, L. (2011). Study and performance of localization methods in IP based networks: Vivaldi algorithm. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 34(1), 351-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donnet, B., Gueye, B., & Kaafar, M. A. (2010). A survey on network coordinates systems, design, and security. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 12(4), 488-503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ng, T. E., & Zhang, H. (2002). Predicting Internet network distance with coordinates-based approaches. In INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE (Vol. 1, pp. 170-179). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tang, L., & Crovella, M. (2003, October). Virtual landmarks for the internet. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement (pp. 143-152). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lim, H., Hou, J. C., & Choi, C. H. (2005). Constructing Internet coordinate system based on delay measurement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 13(3), 513-525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dabek, F., Cox, R., Kaashoek, F., & Morris, R. (2004, August). Vivaldi: A decentralized network coordinate system. In ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review (Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 15-26). ACM. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Costa, M., Castro, M., Rowstron, R., & Key, P. (2004). PIC: Practical Internet coordinates for distance estimation. In Distributed Computing Systems, 2004. Proceedings. 24th International Conference on (pp. 178-187). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ng, T. E., & Zhang, H. (2004, June). A Network Positioning System for the Internet. In USENIX Annual Technical Conference, General Track (pp. 141-154). [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu, Y., Du, H., & Ye, Q. (2015). WDCS: A Weight-Based Distributed Coordinate System. In Combinatorial optimization and application (pp. 251-260). Springer, Cham. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zheng, H., Lua, E. K., Pias, M., & Griffin, T. G. (2005, March). Internet routing policies and round-trip-times. In International Workshop on Passive and Active Network Measurement (pp. 236-250). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cheng, J., Liu, Y., Ye, Q., Du, H., & Vasilakos, A.V (2017). DISCS: A distributed coordinate system based on robust nonnegative matrix completion. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 25(2), 934-947. [J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 2017, 25(2): 934-947. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mao, Y., Saul, L.K, & Smith, J.M (2006). Ides: An internet distance estimation service for large networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(12), 2273-2284. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. The computer journal, 7(4), 308-313 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, Y., Xiong, Y., Shi, X., Deng, B., & Li, X. (2007, November). Pharos: A decentralized and hierarchical network coordinate system for internet distance prediction. In Global Telecommunications Conference, 2007. GLOBECOM’07. IEEE (pp. 421-426). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen, Y., Wang, X., Shi, C., Lua, E.K, Fu, X., Deng, B., & Li, X. (2011). Phoenix: A weight-based network coordinate system using matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 8(4), 334-347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen, Y., Wang, X., Song, X., Lua, E.K, Shi, C., Zhao, X & Li, X. (2009, May). Phoenix: Towards an accurate, practical and decentralized network coordinate system. In International Conference on Research in Networking (pp. 313-325). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao F, Chen J, Ye D & Luo X. (2017, June). A Network Coordinate System Constructing Algorithm Based on Optimal Neighbor Nodes. In Data Science in Cyberspace (DSC), 2017 IEEE Second International Conference on (pp. 140-144). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaafar, M. A., Mathy, L., Turletti, T., & Dabbous, W. (2006, December). Virtual networks under attack: Disrupting internet coordinate systems. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM CoNEXT conference (p. 12). ACM. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee, D. D., & Seung, H.S (1999). Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 401(6755), 788. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Boutsidis, C., & Gallopoulos, E. (2008). SVD based initialization: A head start for nonnegative matrix factorization. Pattern Recognition, 41(4), 1350-1362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.