EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 231 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 231 (2018) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 7
Section Vulnerable road users
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823103005
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. T. Götschi, J. Garrard, B. Giles-Corti, Cycling as a Part of Daily Life: A Review of Health Perspectives, Transp. Rev. 36 pp. 45-71 (2016). doi:10.1080/01441647.2015.1057877 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Okraszewska, K. Nosal, G. Sierpiński, The role of the Polish universities in shaping a new mobility culture - assumptions, conditions, experience. Case study of Gdansk University of Technology, Cracow University of Technology and Silesian University of Technology, in: 7th Int. Conf. Educ. Res. Innov., pp. 2971-2979 (Seville, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. E. Taniguchi, R.G. Thompson, T. Yamada, Recent Trends and Innovations in Modelling City Logistics, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 125 pp. 4-14 (2014). doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.01.1451 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. K. Turoń, D. Golba, P. Czech, The analysis of progress CSR good practices areas in logistic companies based on reports "Responsible Business in Poland : good practices" in 2010-2014, Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 89 pp. 163-171 (2015). doi:10.20858/sjsutst.2015.89.17 [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Okraszewska, K. Grzelec, K. Jamroz, Developing a cycling subsystem as part of a sustainable mobility strategy: the case of Gdansk, Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 92 pp. 87-99 (2016). doi:10.20858/sjsutst.2016.92.9 [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Sierpiński, M. Staniek, I. Celiński, New methods for pro-ecological travel behaviour learning, in: 8th Int. Conf. Educ. Res. Innov., pp. 6926-6933 (IATED, Seville, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Turoń, G. Sierpiński, P. Czech, Mobility in the scope of sustainable development - challenges for urban transport systems, Traffic Eng. 1 pp. 53-57 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Jacyna, M. Wasiak, K. Lewczuk, M. Kłodawski, Simulation model of transport system of Poland as a tool for developing sustainable transport, Arch. Transp. 31 (2014). doi:10.5604/08669546.1146982 [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Okraszewska, A. Romanowska, M. Wołek, J. Oskarbski, K. Birr, K. Jamroz, R. Okraszewska, A. Romanowska, M. Wołek, J. Oskarbski, K. Birr, K. Jamroz, Integration of a Multilevel Transport System Model into Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning, Sustainability. 10 pp. 479 (2018). doi:10.3390/su10020479 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Jacyna-Gołda, Decision-making model for supporting supply chain efficiency evaluation, Arch. Transp. 33 pp. 17-31 (2015). doi:10.5604/08669546.1160923 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Kania, Niechronieni użytkownicy ruchu (piesi, rowerzyści), Inżynieria Ruchu Drog. 3 pp. 46-49 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  12. Road accidents in Poland in 2016. Report of General Police Headquarters of Poland (Warsaw, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. Road accidents in Poland in 2015. Report of General Police Headquarters of Poland (Warsaw, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Macioszek, D. Lach, Analysis of the results of General Traffic Measurements in the West Pomeranian voivodeship from 2005 to 2015, Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 97 pp. 93-104 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.97.9 [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Czech, K. Turoń, R. Urbańczyk, Bike-Sharing as an Element of Integrated Urban Transport System, in: Adv. Solut. Transp. Syst. Grow. Mobility. 14th Sci. Tech. Conf. “Transport Syst. Theory Pract. 2017”. Sel. Pap. Ed. by Eds. Grzegorz Sierpiński, pp. 103-111 (Springer, Cham, 2018). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-62316-0_8 [Google Scholar]
  16. S.A. Shaheen, S. Guzman, H. Zhang, Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2143 pp. 159-167 (2010). doi:10.3141/2143-20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Mátrai, J. Tóth, Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems, Transp. Res. Procedia. 14 pp. 2344-2351 (2016). doi:10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.261 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nextbike, Bike Sharing, Five Generations Later: What's next?, in: 2017 Annu. P. Conf., (Brussels, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. E. Martin, A. Cohen, J. Botha, S. Shaheen, MTI Report 12-54: Bikesharing and Bicycle Safety (Mineta Transportation Institute, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Fishman, P. Schepers, Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety, J. Safety Res. 56 pp. 41-45 (2016). doi:10.1016/J.JSR.2015.11.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A.C. Kristianssen, R. Andersson, M.-Å. Belin, P. Nilsen, Swedish Vision Zero policies for safety - A comparative policy content analysis, Saf. Sci. 103 pp. 260-269 (2018). doi:10.1016/J.SSCI.2017.11.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Okraszewska, Technical and organizational challenges of development of Public-Use Bicycles (PUBs), Logistyka. 4 pp. 3111-3117 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  23. The Guardian, The 8 best cycling innovations: from dockless bikes to solid tyres. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jun/17/10-best-cycling-innovations-dockless-bikes-solid-tyres. Accessed: 2018-04-04, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Turoń, P. Czech, M. Juzek, The concept of a walkable city as an alternative form of urban mobility, Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 95 pp. 223-230 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2017.95.20 [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Staniek, Road pavement condition as a determinant of travelling comfort, in: G. Sierpiński (Ed.), Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., pp. 99-107 (Springer, Cham, 2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43991-4_9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. PSFK Portal, Helmet Rental Vending Machines Keep Bikers Safe On-The-Go. Available at: https://www.psfk.com/2013/05/boston-helmet-rental-vendin-machine.html?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_term=vertical_retail&utm_campaign=vertical - Retail 2013-06-03. Accesse, (n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Pucher, R. Buehler, Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future, Transp. Rev. 37 pp. 689-694 (2017). doi:10.1080/01441647.2017.1340234 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. C.C. Reynolds, M.A. Harris, K. Teschke, P.A. Cripton, M. Winters, The impact of transportation infrastructure on bicycling injuries and crashes: a review of the literature, Environ. Heal. 8 pp. 47 (2009). doi:10.1186/1476-069X-8-47 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Chen, K. Turoń, M. Kłos, P. Czech, W. Pamuła, G. Sierpiński, Fifth generation of bike-sharing systems - examples of Poland and China, Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Ser. Transp. 99 pp. 5-13 (2018). doi:10.20858/sjsutst.2018.99.1 [Google Scholar]
  30. K. Turoń, Car-sharing problems - multi-criteria overview, in: Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Traffic Transp. Eng. ICTTE 2018, pp. 916-922 (Belgrade, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Kubik, K. Turoń, Z. Stanik, Car-sharing systems vehicles versus taxis in urban transport system - legal requirements, technical service, operation, in: Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. Traffic Transp. Eng. ICTTE 2018, pp. 923-930 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.