EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 229 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 229 (2018) 04003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 229, 2018
International Conference on Disaster Management (ICDM 2018)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 6
Section Improving Lesson Learnt in Disaster Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822904003
Published online 14 November 2018
  1. Arsyad, S, Soil and Water Conservation. Bandung: IPB Publisher (2000) (IPB Press). [Google Scholar]
  2. BNPB. Indonesian Disaster Risk. Jakarta. BNPB (2016) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. 2005. Introduction to the Land Movement, Vulcanological Survey of Indonesia. Energy Mineral Resources. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  4. Public Works Department. Spatial Planning Guidance for Landslide Prone Areas. Directorate of Spatial Planning. Jakarta (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. West Sumatra Provincial Forestry Service. Shapefile Land, Geology, Slope data. West Sumatra Provincial Forestry Service. Padang (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. Directorate of Environmental Geology. Land Movement in Indonesia. Directorate General of General Mining. Department of Mines and Energy. Jakarta (1981) [Google Scholar]
  7. [DIRJENPLANHUT] Directorate General of Forestry Planning. Regulation of the Director General of Forestry Planning No. P.3/VIIIPSDH/2014, Technical Guidelines for Drawing and Presenting Forestry Maps. DIRJEN Forestry Planning, Jakarta (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. Fajria L. Measuring Landslide Vulnerability At Sub-District Of Prambanan, Region Of Sleman Using Geographic Information System. Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. Fajria L. Measuring Landslide Vulnerability At Sub-District Of Prambanan, Region Of Sleman Using Geographic Information System. Yogyakarta. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. Karlina. I.I. Analysis of Landslide Vulnerability Level in Part of Class IIIC Road in Gesing Sub-District, Purworejo District, Central Java. Disaster Research Journal, Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1, May 2016: 40-49 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. KPHL Model Solok Unit VI. Long Term Forest Management Plan (RPHJP) Protected Forest Management Unit (KPHL) Solok District Model 2014-2023. Solok District Forestry and Plantation Service, Solok (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. Mardikaningsih. S. M. et, al. Study of Vulnerability and Direction of Flood Disaster Mitigation in Puring District, Kebumen Regency. Journal GeoEco ISSN:2460-0768., Vol. 3, No. 2 (Juli 2017) Hal. 157-163 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. Minister of Public Works. Regulation of the Minister of Public Works No: 22/PRT/M/2007, Guidelines for Spatial Planning for Landslide Prone Areas. public Works Department, Jakarta (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. Nandi. Landslide. Bandung: Department of Geography Education, University of Indonesia Education (UPI) (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. Sudibyakto. Et, al. Disaster Risk Management in the Padang Ciamis Mountain Heritage Area, West Java. Indonesian Disaster Research Journal Vol. 2 No. 1, May 2016 : 50-58 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. Sugianti. K. et, al. Classification of Ground Movement Vulnerability of South Sumedang Area using Storie Method. Journal of the LIPI Geotechnology Research Center. (Ris.Geo.Tam Vol. 24, No. 2, Desember 2014 (93-104) (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. Hidayat. R. et, al. Landslide Handling on Gempol - Pandaan Toll Road Slope Km 51 Pasuruan East Java. Indonesian Disaster Research Journal, Vol. 1 No.2, Oktober 2015 : 15-22. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  18. Aminatun. S. 2015. Implementation of Resettlement Relocation Policy on Landslide Threats (Case Study of Srimartani Village, Piyungan District, Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta Special Region). Indonesian Disaster Research Journal Vol. 1 No.2, 13 October 2015: 23-31. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.