Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 220, 2018
2018 The 2nd International Conference on Mechanical, System and Control Engineering (ICMSC 2018)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 4
Section Mechanical Engineering and Measurement Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822004006
Published online 29 October 2018
  1. Wang, Q., 1994, Hydromecanical deep drawing, New technol. New process. 5, 23–24 [Google Scholar]
  2. Şahin, S., 2004, Hidrolik şekillendirme yönteminin esasları ve sınıflandırılması, Mühendis ve Makine, Cilt:45, Sayı: 533 [Google Scholar]
  3. Lang L.H., Wang Z.R., Kang D.C., Yuan S.J., Zhang S.H., Danckert J., Nielsen K.B., 2004 Hydroforming highlights: Sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming., Journal of Materials Processing Technology 151 : 165–177 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altan T., 2006, Process for hydroforming sheet metal, Stamping Journal, 400–418 [Google Scholar]
  5. Zahedi, S.A., Shamsi, A., Gorji, A., Hosseinipour, S.J., Bakhshi-Jouybari, M., 2009, Theoretical study and finite element simulation of tearing in hydroforming process, Journal of Applied Sciences, 9: 178–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Braedel M., Vavilikolane V., Bartot P., Palaniswamy H., Kaya S., Altan T., 2005, Estimation of the optimal blank holder force and forming pressure trajectory for sheet hydroforming process with punch, ERC/NSM, Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio, Report no: ERC/NSM-05-R-21 [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang S.H., Danckert J., 1998, Development of hydro-mechanical deep drawing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 83: 14–25 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang S.H., 1999, Developments in hydroforming, Journals of Materials Processing Technology, 91: 226–244 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Çelikayar, G., 2003, Yüksek basınç altında metallerin şekillendirilmesi (HIDROFORMING), III. Ulususal Hidrolik Pnömatik Kongresi ve Sergisi, 29–38 [Google Scholar]
  10. Geren, N., Tunç, T., 2003, 3000 bar çift etkili basınç yükselticinin tasarımı ve imalatı, Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakülte Dergisi, Adana, Cilt 18 Özel sayı, 49-51 [Google Scholar]
  11. Geren, N., Tunç, T., 2001, Yapısal farklılıklar içeren sujeti kesme sistemlerinin en uygununun belirlenmesi, Mühendis ve Makine Dergisi, Çukurova-Adana, Cilt 42, Sayı 500, 42-49 [Google Scholar]
  12. Geren, N., Şahin, B., 1995, Su jeti ile kesme teknolojisi ve endüstriyel uygulamaları, Mühendis ve Makine Dergisi, Çukurova-Adana, Cilt 36, Sayı 424, 37–41 [Google Scholar]
  13. Summers, D.A., 1995, Waterjetting tecnology, Chapman And Hall, London, ISBN0.419.19660.9 [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh, P.J., Benson, D., 1992, Development of phased intensifier for waterjet cutting, Ingersoll-Rand Waterjet Cutting Systems, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 306-318 [Google Scholar]
  15. Altan, T., 2006, “Processes for hydroforming sheet metal, Part I: Sheet hydroforming with a die”, Stamping Journal-An FMA Publication, pp. 40-41. [Google Scholar]
  16. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknik Araştırma Kurumu, 2004, Ulusal Bilin ve Teknoloji Politikaları, 2003-2023 Strateji Belgesi, Versiyon 19 [Google Scholar]
  17. Mannesmann Rexroth, Product Catalog, RD/E/F/605/06.00 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dunkes, 2014, Product Catalog, Öttigen [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.