Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 218, 2018
The 1st International Conference on Industrial, Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE 2018)
Article Number 04016
Number of page(s) 7
Section Industrial And Engineering Applications
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821804016
Published online 26 October 2018
  1. K.L. Lalima, Dangwal. “Blended learning: an innovative approach.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 129-136. HRPUB (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Kenney. “Adopting a blended learning approach: challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 15(1), 45-57, 2011. Online Learning Consortium. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Arinto. “Issues and challenges in open and distance e-Learning: perspective from the Philippines”. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (17) 162-180. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Rana, Rajiv, M. Lal. “E-Learning: issues and challenges”. International Journal of Computer Application 97(5), 20-24, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Capra. “Online education: promise and problems.” Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(2), 288-293. Merlot (2011). [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Staker, M.B. Horn. “Classifying K-12 blended learning”. 2012. Innosight Institute. [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Boelens, S. Van Laer, B. De Wever, J. Elen. “Blended learning in adult education: towards a definition of blended learning”. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Ramakrisnan, Yuraidza bt Yahya., M.N.H. Hasrol, A.A. Aziz. “Blended learning: a suitable framework for e-Learning in higher education.” In Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 67, 513-526, 2012. Science Direct. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Liu, H. Yu, “Effectiveness study of English learning in blended learning environment.” Theory and practice in language studies, 2(3), 524-530. Academy Publisher. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. J.M. O’Malley, A.U. Chamot. “Learning strategies in second language acquisition”. Cambridge University Press. (1990) [Google Scholar]
  11. P.R. Pintrick, E. De Groot. “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40, (1990). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Torrisi-Steele, S. Drew. “The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: the need to better understanding of academic blended practice.” International Journal for Academic Development 18(4), 371-383. Taylor & Francis. (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Bowyer, L. Chambers. “Evaluating blended learning: bringing the elements together.” Research Matters 23. UCLES. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Zuvic-Butorac, N. Roncevic, D. Nemcanin, Z. Nebic. “Blended elearning in higher education: research on students’ perspective.” Issues in Informing Sciencce and Information Technology, 8, 409-429, (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y.M. Luna, S.A.Winters. “Why did you blend my learning? A comparison of student success in lecture and blended learning introduction to sociology courses”. In Teaching Sociology, 45(2), 116130, SAGE (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Lubis, M. Kartiwi and S. Zulhuda. “Privacy and personal data protection in electronic voting: factors and measures.” Telkomnika 15(1), pp. 512-521, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Delucchi. “Measuring student learning in social statistics: a pretestposttest study of knowledge gain”. Teaching Sociology 42(3), 231-239. SAGE. (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Patrick, C. Sturgis. “Maximizing competency education and blended learning: insights from experts”. CompetencyWorks Issue Brief. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  19. A.M. Al-Huneidi, J. Schreurs. “Contructivism based blended learning in higher education.” IJET 7(1), (2012) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Lubis, M. Kartiwi and S. Zulhuda.“Current state of personal data protection in electronic voting: criteria and indicator for effective implementation.” Telkomnika, 16(1), 290-301. [Google Scholar]
  21. B. Kistow. “Blended learning in higher education: a study of a graduate school of business, Trinidad and Tobago.” Carribean Teaching Scholar 1(2), 115-128, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  22. M.J. Kintu, C. Zhu and E. Kagambe. “Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes.” Int. J. of Educational Tech. in H. Education 14(7), (2017). [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Moskal, C. Dziuban, J. Hartman. “Blended learning: a dangerous idea?” Internet and Higher Education 18, 15-23, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. L.M. Jeffrey, A. Higgins. “Blended learning: how teachers balance the blend of online and classroom components.” J. of IT Education: Research, 13, 121-140, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  25. A. El-Mowafy, M. Kuhn and T. Snow. “Blended learning in higher education: current and future challenges in surveying education.” Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 132-150, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  26. F.Z. Azizan. “Blended learning in higher education institution in Malaysia.” Proc. Of Regional Conf. on Knowledge Integration in ICT. 454-466. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  27. V. Roblek, M. Mesko and A. Krapez. “A Complex view of industry 4.0“ Sage Open, pp. 1-11. (April-June 2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.