Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 218, 2018
The 1st International Conference on Industrial, Electrical and Electronics (ICIEE 2018)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 7
Section Information Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821803003
Published online 26 October 2018
  1. N. Ahmad, M. W. Boota, A. H. Massom, J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 7, 1045 (2014) https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2014.712092 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Agarwal, V. Venkatesh, Inf. Syst. Res 13, 168-186 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.2.168.84 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Xu, D. Peak, V. Prybutok, Decis. Support Syst. 79, 171 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.08.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Q. Min, S. Li, Q. Zhong, An Empirical Study of M-Commerce Adoption from Usability Perspective (ICMB, 2009) https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMB.2009.44 [Google Scholar]
  5. A. B. Hussain, A. T. Mahmood, R. K. Naser, Investigating the effect of m-commerce design usability on customers’ trust (AIP,2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005410 [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Zhao, Y. Lu, L. Zhang, and P. Y. K. Chau, Decis. Support Syst. 52, 645 (2012) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.10.022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Peng, J. Quan, and S. Zhang, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12, 321 (2013) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.05.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D. B. Setyohadi, S. Kusrohmaniah, E. Christian, L. T. Dewi, B. P. Sukci, M-Learning Interface Design Based On Emotional Aspect Analysis (IHCI, 2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52503-7 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Jadhav, G. Bhutkar, V. Mehta, Usability Evaluation of Messenger Applications for Android Phones using Cognitive Walkthrough (APCHI, 2013) https://doi.org/10.1145/2525194.2525202 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Rieman, M. Franzke, D. Redmiles, Usability Evaluation with the Cognitive Walkthrough (CHI, 1995) https://doi.org/10.1145/223355.223735 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Solano, C. A. Collazos, C. Rusu, H. M. Fardoun, Adv. In H.C.I, 2016 (2016) http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4089520S [Google Scholar]
  12. S. S. Chan, X. Fang, Y. Zhou, and S. Xu, J. Electron. Commer. Res. 3, 187 (2002) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.85.5067 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Mourouzis, M. Antona, and C. Stephandis, Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 10, 337 (2011) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10209-010-0211-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Hussain, E. O. C. Mkpojiogu, N. H. Jamaludin, S. T. L. Moh, A usability evaluation of Lazada mobile application (AIP, 2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5005392 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. L. Keenan, H. R. Hartson, D. G. Kafura, R. S. Schulman, Emp. Soft. Eng 4, 71-104 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009855231530 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Duggirala, S. (2016, Agustus 17). https://blog.prototypr.io/10-usability-heuristics-with-examples-4a81ada920c [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Nielsen, R. Molich, Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces (CHI, 1990) https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Chan, X. Fang, Usability Issues in Mobile Commerce (AMCIS, 2001) http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2001/88 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Pinelle, N. Wong, T. Stach, Heuristic Evaluation for Games: Usability Principles for Video Game Design (CHI, 2008) https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357282 [Google Scholar]
  20. Likert Scales and Data Analyses. (2007, 7). Retrieved 5 7, 2018, from Quality Progress: http://rube.asq.org/quality-progress/2007/07/statistics/likert-scales-and-data-analyses.html [Google Scholar]
  21. Travis, D. (2009, 10 5). How to prioritise usability problems. Retrieved 5 7, 2018, from USERFOCUS: https://www.userfocus.co.uk/articles/prioritise.html [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Georgsson, N. Staggers, J. Biomed. Inform. 59, 115 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2015.11.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.