Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2018
22nd International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2018)
Article Number 04050
Number of page(s) 8
Section Computers
Published online 05 October 2018
  1. B. Mundial, Helping countries combat corruption: the role of the World Bank PREM, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  2. Y. Fan, Z. Zhang, & Q. Yue, E-government, Transparency and Anti-corruption, Management of e-Commerce and e-Government, 101-104 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. Welp et al., ¿Hacia el fin de la administración pública burocrática?, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. J. I. Criado y A. Corojan, ¿Pueden las TIC cambiar la transparencia, lucha contra la corrupción y rendición de cuentas en los gobiernos latinoamericanos? XIV ELE, 2037-2072 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Dietrich, J. Gray, T. McNamara, A. Poikola, P. Pollock, J. Tait, & T. Zijlstra, Open data handbook, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Fazekas, I. Tóth., & L. King., An objective corruption risk index using public procurement data, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22(3), 369-397 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Papadopoulou & M. Giaoutzi, Crowdsourcing as a tool for knowledge acquisition in spatial planning, Future. Internet, 6(1), 109-125 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. W. Smith & M. Bertozzi, Principals and agents: An explanatory model for public budgeting, Public Budgeting, Account. Financ. Manag., 10(3), 325-353 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Schedler, L. Diamond, & M. Plattner, The self- restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies. Lynne Rienner Publishers, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Relly & M. Sabharwal, Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: A cross- national study, Gov. Inf. Q., 26(1), 148-157 (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Florini, The right to know: transparency for an open world, Columbia University Press, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Valverde, Transparencia, acceso a la información y rendición de cuentas: experiencias en la Unión Europea y México. ITESM, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. der Eijk & M. Franklin, Elections and voters, Palgrave Macmillan, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Howe, The rise of crowdsourcing, Wired Mag., 14(6), 1-4 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Brabham, Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: leveraging the collective intelligence of online communities for public good. The University of Utah, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  16. T. Erickson, Geocentric crowdsourcing and smarter cities: Enabling urban intelligence in cities and regions, 1st Ubiquitous Crowdsourcing Workshop at UbiComp, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hosseini, K. Phalp, J. Taylor, & R. Ali, The four pillars of crowdsourcing: A reference model, IEEE (RCIS), 1-12 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Fazekas, I. Tóth, & L. King, Anatomy of grand corruption: A composite corruption risk index based on objective data, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Barr, E. Pinilla, & J. Finke, A Legal Perspective on the Use of Models in the Fight against Corruption, SCJ Int'l L. Bus., 8, 267 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Gruber, Collective knowledge systems: Where the social web meets the semantic web, Web Semant. Sci. Serv. agents World Wide Web, 6(1), 4-13 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Matsunaga, A. Mast, & J. Fortes, Workforce- efficient consensus in crowdsourced transcription of biocollections information, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst., 56, 526-536 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Kohonen, Median strings, Pattern Recognit. Lett., 3(5), 309-313 (1985). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. C. de la Higuera & F. Casacuberta, Topology of strings: Median string is NP-complete, Theor. Comput. Sci., 230(1), 39-48 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Rey & P. Vélez, Control de calidad en sistemas crowdsourcing: un mapeo sistemático, Sci. Tech., 22(1), 73-82 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.