Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 210, 2018
22nd International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2018)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Systems
Published online 05 October 2018
  1. T. Nowicki, R. Waszkowski, A. Saniuk, Business process analysis of a foodborne outbreak investigation mobile system. In. IV International Conference on Modern Technologies in Industrial Engineering (ModTech 2016), Iasi, Romania, 15-18 June 2016, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering Volume 145 (Eds.: Cohal V. et al.), Bristol: Institute of Physics, 2016, s. 864-868, ISBN: 978-1-5108-2912-1 [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, A. Saniuk, T. Nowicki, The maintenance management in the macro-ergonomics context, Advances in Social & Occupational Ergonomics vol 487, (2017), Springer Series, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Goossens R.H.M. (Ed.), pp. 35-46, ISBN 978-3-319-41688-5 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Waszkowski, T. Nowicki, M. Kiedrowicz, Classified Document Flow Management, in Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017, July 17-21, (2017), The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA (Ed. Richard H.M.Goossens) ISSN 2194-5357, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-60828-0, Springer International Publishing AG 2018, pp. 62-71, Series: Advanced in Intelligent Systems and Computing No 605, ISBN 978-3-319-60827-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. W. van der Aalst, M. van H. Kees, Workflow Management, Models, Methods and Systems, The MIT Press Cambridge, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  5. H. Jonkers, H.M. Franken, Quantitative modeling and analysis of business processes, Simulation in Industry, 8th European Simulation Symposium, vol.I, p.175-179, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Tarumyan, Timing analysis for workflow processes, 17th European Simulation Symposium and Exhibition Within I3M’05 International Mediterranean Modeling Multiconference, p. 51-57, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  7. W. van der Aalst, J. Desel, E. Kindler, On the semantics of EPCs: A vicious circle, Workshop on EPK, p. 7-18, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Koehler, R. Hauser, Untangling unstructured cyclic flows - a solution based on continuations, 6th Int. Conference on Cooperative Information Systems CoopIs, Springer LNCS 3290, p. 121-138, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Tarumyan, A System of performance characteristics analysis for business processes, CSIT2011 Eighth International Conference on Computer Science and Information technologies, p. 198-201, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Dirk, C. Favre, B. Jobstmann, J. Koehler, N. Lohmann, H. Völzer, K. Wolf, Instantaneous soundness checking of industrial business process models, 7th Int. Conference on Business Process Management, Springer LNCS 5701, p. 278-293, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Cardoso, A. Sheth, J. Miller, Workflow quality of service, International Conference on Enterprise Integration and Modeling Technology and International Enterprise Modeling Conference (ICEIMT/IEMC’02), (2002). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. H. Son, M. H. Kim, Analyzing the critical path for the well-formed workflow schema, Seventh International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications DASFAA, p.146-147, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Eder, E. Panagos, Managing time in workflow systems, Workflow Handbook 2001, Layne Fischer ed., ISBN 0-9703509-0-2, p. 109-132, (2001). [Google Scholar]
  14. F.E. Allen, J. Cocke, A program data flow analysis procedure, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, (1971). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Vanhatalo, H. Volzer, F. Leymann, Faster and more focused control-flow analysis for business process models though SESE decomposition, ICSOC, Vol. 4749, p. 43-55, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Vanhatalo, H. Völzer, J. Koehler, The refined process structure tree, Data & Knowledge Engineering, v.68 n.9, p. 793-818, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Bellman. Dynamic Programming, Princeton University Press, (1957). [Google Scholar]
  18. Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC), Workflow Standard - Process Definition Interchange, Process Model. WfMC TC-1016-P.Version 1.1, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Leymann, D. Roller, Production Workflow: concepts and techniques. Prentice Hall, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  20. M. A Schaefer, Mathematical Theory of Global Program Optimization. Prentice-Hall, (1973). [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Raulefs, S. Shoukourian, L. Tarumyan, V Matevosyan, Determination of critical paths in hammock type processes, HPC’2003, SCS International Advanced Simulation Technologies Conference ASTC’2003, p. 241-246, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  22. K. Grzybowska, G. Kovács, The modelling and design process of coordination mechanisms in the supply chain, Journal of Applied Logic, 24, pp. 25-38, 2017, DOI: 10.1016/j.jal.2016.11.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Chlebus, A. Burduk, A. Kowalski, Concept of a Data Exchange Agent System for Automatic Construction of Simulation Models of Manufacturing Processes, Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems, Part II, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 6th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems (HAIS 2011), SN 0302-9743, BN 978-3-642-21221-5, WOS:000297712800046 [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Waszkowski, M. Kiedrowicz, T. Nowicki, K. Worwa, Customer service processes automation in administrative office with RFID tagged documents, Fourth International Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sciences and in Industry, pp. 224-233, DOI 10.1109/MCSI.2017.46 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Kiedrowicz, Dynamic business process in workflow systems, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol.125, DOI:10.1051/matecconf/201712502014 Greece (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.