EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 199 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 199 (2018) 09007 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 199, 2018
International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting (ICCRRR 2018)
Article Number 09007
Number of page(s) 9
Section Structural Repair Materials and Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819909007
Published online 31 October 2018
  1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2012. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2011. The Manual of Bridge Evaluation, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abushagur, M., Youssef, M. and El Damatty, A. 2003. Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Steel Beams Rehabilitated Using GFRP Sheets. Steel and Composite Structures, 3(6), pp. 421–428. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. MS Thesis. [Google Scholar]
  5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2015. Report card for America’s infrastructure, Reston, VA. http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/ Accessed 25 February 2015. [Google Scholar]
  6. Britle, V., & Mark, P. 2006. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure, ABAQUS User’s Conference, 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brinkman, R.J. 2012. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer repairs of impact-damaged prestressed I-girders. University of Cincinnati. Cincinnati, Ohio. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bullock, W.O., Barnes, R.W., Schindler, A.K. 2011. Repair of cracked prestressed concrete girders, I-565. Samuel Ginn College of Engineering, Aubrun, AL. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cha, J.Y. 2001. Analysis of prestressed concrete beams strengthened with carbon fiber composites. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dessault Systems 2016. ABAQUS Unified FEA. http://www.3ds.com/products-services/simulia/products/abaqus/. Accessed 8 April 2015 [Google Scholar]
  11. Green, P.S., & Boyd, A.J. 2005. CFRP repair of impact-damaged bridge girders. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasenkamp, C.J., Badie, S.S., Hanna K.E., Tadros, M.K. 2012. Proposed evaluation and repair procedures for precast, prestressed concrete girders with end zone cracking. PCI Journal. V. 57 No. 2 pp. 94–119. [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang, J. 2010. Durability design of GFRP bar reinforced concrete members: a new approach. ACI Special Publication. Tampa, FL. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hutchinson, R.I. 1999. The use of externally bonded CFRP sheets for shear strengthening of I-shape prestressed concrete bridge girders. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba. [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson, D.T. 2014. Investigation of glass fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars as internal reinforcement for concrete structures. University of Toronto, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kasan, J.L. 2009. Structural repair of prestressed concrete bridge girders. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Klaiber, F.W., Wipf, T.J., & Kempers, B.J. 2003. Repair of damaged prestressed concrete bridges using CFRP. Proceedings of the 2003 Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium, Ames, IA. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kmiecik, P., & Kaminski, M. 2011. Modelling of reinforced concrete structures and composite structures with concrete strength degradation taken into consideration. Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z.o.o. [Google Scholar]
  19. Laosiriphong, K. 2000. Development and evaluation of glass fiber reinforced composite/wood railroad crossties. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. oai:wvuscholar.wvu.edu:5017 [Google Scholar]
  20. Mahmood, H. 2002. Cracking of concrete members reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer bars. [Google Scholar]
  21. Memon, M.S., & Sheikh, S.A. 2005. Seismic resistance of square concrete columns retrofitted with glass fiber -reinforced polymers. ACI Structural Journal. V. 102 No. 5 Sept.-Oct. pp. 774–783. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nanni, A., Luca, A.D., & Zadeh, H.J. 2014. Reinforced concrete with FRP bars: mechanics and design. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Florida. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Harries, K.A., Kasan, J., Miller, R., & Brinkman, R. 2012. Updated research for collision damage and repair of prestressed concrete beams. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). [Google Scholar]
  24. Pantelides, C.D., Reaveley, L.D., & Burningham, C.A. 2010. Repair of prestressed concrete girder ends and girder collision repair. Utah Department of Transportation Research Division. Salt Lake City, UT. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ragaby, A.E. 2007. Fatigue behavior of concrete bridge deck slabs reinforced with glass FRP bars. Université de Sherkrooke, Quebec, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosenboom, OA. 2006. Behavior of FRP repair/strengthening systems for prestressed concrete. North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenboom, OA., & Rizkalla, S., 2006. Behavior of prestressed concrete strengthened with various CFRP systems subjected to fatigue loading. ASCE Journal of Composites for Construction. V. 10 No. 6 pp. 492–502. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gangarao, H., Vijay, P.V. and Abhari, R.S.. 2010. Rehabilitation of timber railroad bridges using GFRP composites.2010 Joint Rail Conference, Urbana, Illinois. [Google Scholar]
  29. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) 2015. Bridge Standards. https://www.dot.state.tx.us/insdtdot/orgchart/cmd/cs erve/standard/bridge-e.htm. Accessed 11 May 2015 [Google Scholar]
  30. Wahalathantri, L.B., Thambiratnam, D.P., & Chan T.H.T., Fawzia, S. 2011. A material model for flexural crack simulation in reinforced concrete elements using ABAQUS. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Aus [Google Scholar]
  31. Wight, J.K., & MacGregor, J.G. 2012. Reinforced Concrete Mechanics & Design. Pearson Education, Inc. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.