Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 195, 2018
The 4th International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering (ICRMCE 2018)
Article Number 02017
Number of page(s) 14
Section Structural Engineering
Published online 22 August 2018
  1. M. Sukrawa, Penyertaan Dinding Pengisi Dalam Pemodelan Kerangka Beton Bertulang Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Hasil Perencanaan Struktur, Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil, 4, S401-S408 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Gautham, K. G. Krishna, Mater. Tod.: Proc., 4, 10565-10569 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. J. Crisafulli, Seismic Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Structures with Masonry Infills (Thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Crowley, R. Pinho, Simplified Equations for Estimating the Period of Vibration of Existing Buildings, First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, 1122 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. N. A. Saruddin, F. M. Nazri, Proc. Eng., 125, 873-878 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Cardone, M. Rossino, G. Gesualdi, Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng. (article in press) (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. FEMA. HAZUS-MH MR5, Advanced Engineering Building Module (AEBM) (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  8. ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings (Applied Technology Council Redwood City, CA, volume 1, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  9. V. Silva, H. Varum, H. Crowley, R. Sousa, R. Pinho, Evaluation of Analytical Methodologies to Derive Vulnerability Functions, 15th World Conference Earthquake Engingeering, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. B. Mander, M. J. N. Priestley and R. Park, ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 114, 1804-1826 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Menegotto and P. E. Pinto, Method of Analysis for Cyclically Loaded R.C. Plane Frames Including Changes in Geometry and Non-elastic Behaviour of Elements under Combined Normal Force and Bending, Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, Zurich, Switzerland (1973) [Google Scholar]
  12. F. C. Filippou, E. P. Popov and V. V. Bertero, ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 109, 2666-2684 (1983) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. F. J. Crisafulli, A. J. Carr, Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earth. Eng., 40, 69-77 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. B. E. Wahyudianto, Tinjauan Kuat Tekan dan Kuat Lentur Dinding Pasangan Batu Bata dengan Perkuatan Diagonal Tulangan Baja (Skripsi, Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Smyrou, Implementation and Verification of a Masonry Panel Model for Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Infilled RC Frames (Dissertation, University of Pavia, Italy, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. G. J. W. King and P. C. Pandey, Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Part 2, 65, 749-760 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. da Porto, G. Guidi, M. D. Benetta, N. Verlato, combined in-plane/out-of-plane experimental behaviour of reinforced and strengthened infill masonry walls, 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. E. Klingner and V. V. Bertero, ASCE J. Struct. Div., 104, 973-989 (1978) [Google Scholar]
  19. FEMA 356, Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, (Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Meslem, D. D’Ayala, Toward Worldwide Guidelines for the Development of Analytical Vulnerability Functions and Fragility Curves at Regional Level, 15th World Conference Earthquake Engineering. (2012) [Google Scholar]
  21. SeismoSoft, Seismostruct-a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, Available from URL: http// (2006) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Choudhury, H.B. Kaushik, Eng. Struct., 155, 1-13 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Papailia, Seismic fragility curves for reinforced concrete buildings (Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Master Degree, University of Patras, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  24. Eurocode 8, Design of Structure for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings (British Standard, 389 Chiswick High Road, London W4 4AL, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Astuti, Rapid and in-depth Analysis for Seismic Risk Evaluation (Thesis, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, 2017) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.