Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 186, 2018
2018 The 7th International Conference on Engineering Mathematics and Physics (ICEMP 2018)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 01006 | |
Number of page(s) | 5 | |
Section | Applied Mathematics and Physics | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201818601006 | |
Published online | 06 August 2018 |
- Hossain MS, Nakamura T, Kimura F, Yagi Y, Yamaguchi M. Practical image quality evaluation for whole slide imaging scanner. In Biomedical Imaging and Sensing Conference 2018 Apr 24 (Vol. 10711, p. 107111S). International Society for Optics and Photonics. [Google Scholar]
- Andrew J Evans et al.. “Implementation of whole slide imaging for clinical purposes: Issues to consider from the perspective of early adopters”. In:Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 141.7 (2017), pp. 944-959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vosoughi A, Smith PT, Zeitouni JA, Sodeman GM, Jorda M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Garcia-Buitrago M, Petito CK, Chapman JR, Campuzano-Zuluaga G, Rosenberg AE. Frozen section evaluation via dynamic real-time non-robotic Telepathology system in a university Cancer center by resident/faculty cooperation team. Human pathology. 2018 May 1. [Google Scholar]
- Tabata K, Mori I, Sasaki T, Itoh T, Shiraishi T, Yoshimi N, Maeda I, Harada O, Taniyama K, Taniyama D, Watanabe M. Whole-slide imaging at primary pathological diagnosis: Validation of wholeslide imaging-based primary pathological diagnosis at twelve Japanese academic institutes. Pathology international. 2017 Nov 1;67(11):547-54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Farahani N, Liu Z, Jutt D, Fine JL. Pathologists' Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Mock-up of a Prototype Information System to Facilitate Automation of Pathology Sign-out. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2017 Jul 7;141(10):1413-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Farahani N, Liu Z, Jutt D, Fine JL. Pathologists' Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Mock-up of a Prototype Information System to Facilitate Automation of Pathology Sign-out. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2017 Jul 7;141(10):1413-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lu Q, Liu G, Xiao C, Hu C, Zhang S, Xu RX, Chu K, Xu Q, Smith ZJ. A modular, open-source, slidescanning microscope for diagnostic applications in resource-constrained settings. PloS one. 2018 Mar 15;13(3):e0194063. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chantziantoniou N, Mukherjee M, Donnelly AD, Pantanowitz L, Austin RM. Digital Applications in Cytopathology: Problems, Rationalizations, and Alternative Approaches. Acta cytologica. 2018;62:68-76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Farahani N, Liu Z, Jutt D, Fine JL. Pathologists' Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Mock-up of a Prototype Information System to Facilitate Automation of Pathology Sign-out. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 2017 Jul 7;141(10):1413-20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jafarian AH, Tasbandi A, Mohamadian Roshan N. Evaluation of photoshop based image analysis in cytologic diagnosis of pleural fluid in comparison with conventional modalities. Diagnostic cytopathology. 2018 Apr 19. [Google Scholar]
- Platiša L, Van Brantegem L, Kumcu A, Ducatelle R, Philips W. Influence of study design on digital pathology image quality evaluation: the need to define a clinical task. Journal of Medical Imaging. 2017 Jun;4(2):021108 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bueno G, Déniz O, Fernández-Carrobles MD, Vállez N, Salido J. An automated system for whole microscopic image acquisition and analysis. Microscopy research and technique. 2014 Sep 1;77(9):697-713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chan CC, Huang SK, Chen HH. Enhancement of phase detection for autofocus. InImage Processing (ICIP), 2017 IEEE International Conference on 2017 Sep 17 (pp. 41-45). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Feng H, Xu Z, Li Q, Chen Y, Cen M. Fast auto-focus scheme based on optical defocus fitting model. Journal of Modern Optics. 2018 Apr 16;65(7):858-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fu G, Cao Y, Lu M. A fast auto-focusing method of microscopic imaging based on an improved MCS algorithm. Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences. 2015 Sep;8(05):1550020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C, Hou G, Zhang Z, Sun Z, Tan T. Efficient auto-refocusing for light field camera. Pattern Recognition. 2018 Sep 1;81:176-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y, Feng H, Xu Z, Li Q, Chen Y, Cen M. Fast auto-focus scheme based on optical defocus fitting model. Journal of Modern Optics. 2018 Apr 16;65(7):858-68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cabazos-Marín AR, Álvarez-Borrego J. Automatic focus and fusion image algorithm using nonlinear correlation: Image quality evaluation. Optik. 2018 Jul 1;164:224-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nadeau JL, Bedrossian M, Lindensmith CA. Imaging technologies and strategies for detection of extant extraterrestrial microorganisms. Advances in Physics: X. 2018 Jan 1;3(1):1424032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Choi S, Min SW. Depth extraction using depth of field imaging with tilted retroreflective structure. InConsumer Electronics (ICCE), 2018 IEEE International Conference on 2018 Jan 12 (pp. 1-3). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- Tian Y, Cui H, Pan Z, Liu J, Yang S, Liu L, Wang W, Li L. Improved three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm from a multifocus microscopic image sequence based on a nonsubsampled wavelet transform. Applied Optics. 2018 May 10;57(14):3864-72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Li Q, Zhong J, Zhong S, Chen Z, Qi S, Zhang H. An self-focusing imaging method for leukocyte recognition. InImage and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISPBMEI), 2017 10th International Congress on 2017 Oct 14 (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
- Ishihara, T., Kitani, K. M., Asakawa, C., & Hirose, M. (2018, March). Deep Radio-Visual Localization. In Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on (pp. 596-605). IEEE. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.