Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 175, 2018
2018 International Forum on Construction, Aviation and Environmental Engineering-Internet of Things (IFCAE-IOT 2018)
Article Number 03063
Number of page(s) 6
Section Computer Simulation and Design
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817503063
Published online 02 July 2018
  1. X.F. Hu, E.F. Wu, J.S. Bao, Y. Jin. (2010). A branch-and-bound algorithm to minimize the line length of a two-sided assembly line. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 206(3):703–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Bartholdi. (1993). Balancing two-sided assembly lines: a case study. Int. J. Prod. Res. 31(10):2447–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. E.F. Wu, Y. Jin, J.S. Bao, X.F. Hu. (2008). A branch-and-bound algorithm for two-sided assembly line balancing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 39:1009–1015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Li, Q.Tang, L.P. Zhang. (2016). Minimizing the Cycle Time in Two-Sided Assembly Lines with Assignment Restrictions: Improvements and a Simple Algorithm. Math. Prob. Eng. vol. 2016, Article ID 4536426, 15 pages. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Falkenauer. (2005) Line balancing in the real world. The International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management, Lumiere Univeristy of Lyon, France, July 1, pp 360-370. [Google Scholar]
  6. N. A. Schofield. (1979). Assembly line balancing and the application of computer techniques. Comput. Ind. Eng. 3(1), 53–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Gamberini, A. Grassi, B. Rimini. (2006). A New Multi-objective Heuristic Algorithm for Solving the Stochastic Assembly Line Re-balancing Problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 102(2):226-243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. Gamberini, E. Gebennini, A. Grassi, A. Regattieri. (2009). A multiple single-pass heuristic algorithm solving the stochastic assembly line rebalancing problem. Int. J. Prod. Res. 47(8): 2141-2164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. F.Makssoud, O. Battaïa, A. Dolgui, K. Mpofu, O. Olabanji. (2015). Re-balancing problem for assembly lines: new mathematical model and exact solution method. Assembly. Autom. 35(1): 16-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. Sancı, M. Azizoğlu. (2017). Rebalancing the assembly lines: exact solution approaches [J]. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(20): 5991–6010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Altemeier, M. Helmdach, A. Koberstein, W. Dangelmaier. (2009). Reconfiguration of Assembly Lines under the Influence of High Product Variety in the Automotive Industry-A Decision Support System. Int. J. Prod. Res. 48 (21): 6235–6256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. N. Grangeon, P. Leclaire, S. Norre. (2011). Heuristics for the re-balancing of a vehicle assembly line. Int. J. Prod. Res. 49(22): 6609-6628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. J. Yang, J. Gao, L. Y. Sun. (2013). A Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm for Mixed-model Assembly Line Rebalancing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65(1):109-116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Zha, J. J. Yu. (2014). A Hybrid Ant Colony Algorithm for U-Line Balancing and Rebalancing in Just-in-Time Production Environment. J. Manuf. Syst. 33 (1): 93–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Celik, Y. Kara, Y. Atasagun. (2014). A new approach for rebalancing of U-lines with stochastic task times using ant colony optimisation algorithm. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(24): 7262-7275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Y.H. Zhang, X.F. Hu, C.X. Wu. (2017). A modified multi-objective genetic algorithm for two-sided assembly line re-balancing problem of a shovel loader. Int. J. Prod. Res. (4) :1-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y.Y. Haimes, L.S.Lasdon, D.A. Wismer. (1971). On a Bi-criterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization. IEEE. T. Syst. Man. Cy-S. 1:296-297. [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.K. Kim, Y.H. Kim, Y.J. Kim. (2000). Two-sided Assembly Line Balancing: A Genetic Algorithm Approach. Prod. Plan. Control. 11(1):44–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T.R. Hoffmann. (1963). Assembly line balancing with a precedence matrix. Manage. Sci. 9: 551–562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.