EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 174 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 174 (2018) 02001 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 174, 2018
3rd Scientific Conference Environmental Challenges in Civil Engineering (ECCE 2018)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 8
Section Material Engineering, Waste Management in Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817402001
Published online 26 June 2018
  1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2015). Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2013 Fact Sheet, Assessing Trends in Material Generation, Recycling and Disposal in the United States, June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. National Association for PET Container Resources Member (NAPCOR) (2016). Postconsumer PET Container Recycling Activity in 2015, Report, Florence, KY. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frigione, M. (2010). Recycling of PET Bottles as Fine Aggregate in Concrete, Waste Management, Vol. 30, pp. 1101-1106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. www.myreplenish.com, accessed July 17, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  5. Mello, D., Pezzin, S. H. and Amico, S. C. (2009). The Effect of Post-Consumer PET Particles on the Performance of Flexible Polyurethane Foams, Polymer Testing, Vol. 28, pp. 702-708. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Siddique, R., Khatib, J., and Kaur, I. (2008). Use of Recycled Plastic in Concrete: A Review, Waste Management, Vol. 28, pp. 1835-1852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma, R. and Bansal, P. P. (2016). Use of Different Forms of Waste Plastic in Concrete - A Review, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 112, pp. 473-482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mobasher, B. and Li, C.Y. (1996). Effect of Interfacial Properties on the Crack Propagation in Cement Based Composites, Journal of Advanced Cement Based Materials, Vol. 4, pp. 93-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pezzi, L., De Luca, P., Vuono, E., Chiappetta, F., and Nasetro, A. (2006). Concrete Products with Waste's Plastic Material (Bottle, Glass, Plate). Journal of Materials Science Forum, Vols. 514 - 516, pp. 1753-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tam, W.Y.V., Tam, C.M. and Wang, Y. (2007). Optimization on Proportion for Recycled Aggregate in Concrete Using Two-Stage Mixing Approach, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 1928 - 1939. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernando, P. T., Castro Gomes, J. P. and Said, J. (2008). Adhesion Characterization of Tungsten Mine Waste Geopolymeric Binder, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 154 - 161. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yao, Z., Zhang, X., Ge, Z., Jin, Z., Han, J., and Pan, X. (2015). Mix Proportion Design and Mechanical Properties of Recycled PET Concrete, ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 1 - 9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hager, A. S. (2009). Sustainable Design of Pervious Concrete Pavements, PhD Dissertation, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tennis, P., Leming, M., and Akers, D. (2007). Pervious Concrete Pavements, EB302.03, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang, B., Wu, H. Shu, X. and Burdette, E. G. (2010). Laboratory Evaluation of Permeability and Strength of Polymer-modified Pervious Concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 24, pp. 818-823. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ACI 211.3R (2002). Guide for Selecting Proportions for No-Slump Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. [Google Scholar]
  17. ACI 522R (2010). Report on Pervious Concrete, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.