Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 22028
Number of page(s) 6
Section Posters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816522028
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. Medina HE, Pidaparti R, Hinderliter B. Appl. Mechs. Rev. 67: 010802(2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. Pilkey W, Pilkey D. Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors. 3rd ed., New York :Wiley.(2008) [Google Scholar]
  3. Neuber H. Kerbspannungslehre.2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin: Germany.(1958) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peterson RE, Stress concentration factors. New York :Wiley(1974) [Google Scholar]
  5. Castagnetti D, Dragoni E. Materialwissenschaft Und Werkstofftechnik. 44: 364-71.(2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gao H. J Mech. Phys. Solids. 39: 443-58 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Medina H. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 69-70:86-93(2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rice JR. J Appl. Mech. 52: 571, (1985) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Medina H, B Hinderliter. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 51 (10) :2012-2018,(2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor D, Clancy OM. Fatigue. Fract. Eng. M. 14: 329-36.(2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ås SK, Skallerud B, Tveiten BW. Int. J. Fatigue. 30: 2200-2209(2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schijve J. Fatigue. Engng. Mater. Struct. 3: 325–338(1980) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gates N, Fatemi A. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec. 84:3-25(2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schijve J. Fatigue Engng Mater Struct 1982;5: 77-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filippini M. Int. J. Fatigue. 22:397-409.(2000) [Google Scholar]
  16. Adib-Ramezani H, Jeong J. Comp. Mater. Sci. 39:649-63(2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Milošević I, Winter G, Grün F. IProcedia Eng. 160:61-68(2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang G, Liu Jun, Liu YS, Yue ZF.Journal of mechanical strength,32(1):110-115.(2010) [Google Scholar]
  19. Yao CF, Wu DX, Jin QC, et al. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China. 23:650–660(2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ardi DT, Li YG, Chan KHK, Blunt L, Bache MR. Procedia Cirp. 13:19-24(2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Aoto Y, Noguchi H. Int. J. Fract. 131:59-78(2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao H. Int. J. Solids. Struct. 28:703-25(1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rusk DT, W Hoppe, W Braisted, N Powar. Int. J. Fatigue. 31:1454-63(2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith RA, Miller KJ. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 20: 201-06(1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rice J. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Duxbury Press.(1994) [Google Scholar]
  26. ASTM E-8M-98. (1995) [Google Scholar]
  27. ASTM E-466. (2004) [Google Scholar]
  28. Lacerda JCD, Martins GD, Signoretti VT, Teixeira RLP. Int. J. Fatigue. 102:143-148(2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Shahzad M, Chaussumier M, Chieragatti R, Mabru C, et al. J. Mat. Processing. Tech. 210:1821-1826(2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.