EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 165 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 165 (2018) 22019 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 22019
Number of page(s) 8
Section Posters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816522019
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. Teisseyre R. (ed.) Theory of Earthquake Premonitory and Fracture Processes, PWN, Warszawa, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  2. Christensen, R.M., The Theory of Materials Failure, Oxford Univeristy Press, 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jaeger, J., N. G. Cook, and R. Zimmerman (2007), Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, pp. 488, Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA. [Google Scholar]
  4. Griffith A.A., The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, Vol. 221,163-198, 1921. [Google Scholar]
  5. Czechowski Z., A kinetic model of crack fusion, Geophys. J. Int., 104, 419-422, 1991. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Czechowski Z., A kinetic model of nucleation, propagation and fusion of cracks, J. Phys. Earth, 41, 127-137, 1993. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Czechowski Z., Dynamics of fracturing and cracks [w] „Theory of Earthquake Premonitory and Fracture Processes”, R. Teisseyre [ed], PWN, Warszawa, 447-469, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  8. Czechowski Z., A kinetic model of macrocrack propagation, Acta Geophys. Pol. 45, no 3, 193-204, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  9. Czechowski Z., A generalized model of three component mixture of crack, Acta Geophys. Pol, 46, no 4, 375-388, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Czechowski Z., A stochastic approach to the cracktip propagation model, Acta Geophys. Pol. 48, no.1, 57-68, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  11. Onate E., Rojek J., Combination of discrete element and Finite element methods for dynamic analysis of geomechanics problems (2004). Computer methods in applied mechanics andengineering, 193, 3087-3128 [Google Scholar]
  12. Klejment P., Dębski W., „Brazilian Test – A Microscopic Point of View on The Tensile Fracture Generation”, conference proceedings, V International Conference on Particle-based Methods – Fundamentals and Application [Google Scholar]
  13. Klejment P., Kosmala A., Foltyn N., Dębski W., „Symulacje komputerowe parametrów mikroskopowych i makroskopowych materiałów przy pomocy Metody Elementów Dyskretnych”, „Innowacje w polskiej nauce w obszarze matematyki i informatyki”, p.5-19 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cundall, P. A., and O. D. L. Strack (1979), A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies, Geotechnique, 29(1), 47–65, doi:10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 [Google Scholar]
  15. Egholm, D. L. (2007), A new strategy for discrete element numerical models: 1. Theory, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B05203, doi:10.1029/2006JB004557 [Google Scholar]
  16. Fakhimi, A., and E. Alavi Gharahbagh (2011), Discrete element analysis of the effect of pore size and pore distribution on the mechanical behavior of rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 48(1),77–85, doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.08.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Sullivan C., Particulate Discrete Element Modeling: A Geomechanics Perspective, S.1.: Spon Press/Taylor & Francis, 2011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Potyondy, D., and P. Cundall (2004), A bonded-particle model for rock, Int. J. Rock Mech. and Min. Sci., 41 (8), 1329–1364, doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Abe S., Boros V., Hancock W., Weatherley D., ESyS – Particle Tutorial and User’s Guide Version 2.3.1, 2014 https://launchpad.net/esys-particle [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Y. G., Imaging, Modeling and Assimilation in Seismology, De Gruyter, Berlin 2012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Udias U., R. Madariaga, E. Buforn, Source Mechanisms of Earthquakes: Theory and Practice, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Newman W., Gabrielov A., Durand T., Phoenix S.L. and D. Turcotte, An exact renormalization model for earthquakes and material failure: statics and dynamics, Physica D 77, 200-216, 1994. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Peirce F.T., J. Text. Ind. 17, 355, 1926. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.