Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 165, 2018
12th International Fatigue Congress (FATIGUE 2018)
Article Number 22012
Number of page(s) 7
Section Posters
Published online 25 May 2018
  1. C. Q. Wang, J. J. Xiong, R. A. Shenoi, et al. Int J Fatigue. 83, 280-287 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. G. R. Chanani, Effect of thickness on retardation behavior of 7075 and 2024 aluminum alloys, Flaw Growth and Fracture, 365-387 (ASTM International, 1977) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. T. Zhao, J. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Int J Fatigue. 30(7), 1169-1180 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S. Y. Lee, P. K. Liaw, H. Choo, et al. Acta Mater. 59(2), 485-494 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Lankford, D. L. Davidson, J Eng Mater-T ASME. 98(1), 17-23 (1976) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Lankford, D. L. Davidson, The effect of overloads upon fatigue crack tip opening displacement and crack tip opening closing loads in aluminium alloys. ICF5, Cannes (France) (1981) [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Damri, J. F. Knott, Fatigue Fract Eng M. 14(7), 709-719 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  8. O. E. Wheeler, J Basic Eng-T ASME. 94(1), 181-186 (1972) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Willenborg, R. M. Engle, H. A. Wood. A crack growth retardation model using an effective stress concept. No. AFFDL-TM-71-1-FBR, Air Force Dynamics Lab Wright-Patterson Afb On, (1971) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. K. C. Yuen, F. Taheri. Int J Fatigue. 28(12), 1803-1819 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. P. Gallagher, A generalized development of yield zone models. No. AFFDL-TM-FBR-74-28, AIR FORCE FLIGHT DYNAMICS LAB WRIGHTPATTERSON AFB OH, (1974) [Google Scholar]
  12. W. S. Johnson, Multi-parameter yield zone model for predicting spectrum crack growth. Methods and Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Random Loading. ASTM STP 748, J. B. Chang and C. M. Hudson, Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 85-102 (ASTM International, 1981) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. J. C. Voorwald, M. A. S. Torres, C. C. E. P. Júnior. Int J Fatigue. 13(5), 423-427 (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. X. Huang, M. Torgeir, W. Cui. Int J Fatigue. 30(1), 2-10 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. G. Forman, V. E. Kearney, R. M. Engle. J Basic Eng-T ASME. 89(3), 459-463 (1967) [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Taheri, D. Trask, N. Pegg. Mar Struct. 16(1), 69-91 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Huang, M. Torgeir, W. Cui. Int J Fatigue. 30(1), 2-10 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. F.J. McMaster, D. J. Smith. Int J Fatigue. 23, 93-101 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. J. T. Liu, P. A. Du. Zhang Z Y. Sci China Technol Sc. 55(3), 673-683 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.