Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 154, 2018
The 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Technology for Sustainable Development (ICET4SD 2017)
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 4
Section Earth and Environmental Sciences
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815402001
Published online 28 February 2018
  1. Cuetos, M. J., Gómez, X., Otero, M. and Morán, A. (2010). Anaerobic digestion and co-digestion of slaughterhouse waste (SHW): Influence of heat and pressure pre-treatment in biogas yield. Waste Management, 30(10), 1780-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ferrer, I., Ponsá, S., Vázquez, F. and Font, X. (2008). Increasing biogas production by thermal (70°C) sludge pre-treatment prior to thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 42(2), 186-92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frigon, J.-C., Mehta, P. and Guiot, S. R. (2012). Impact of mechanical, chemical and enzymatic pre-treatments on the methane yield from the anaerobic digestion of switchgrass. Biomass and Bioenergy, 36(1-11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ghodale, M. D. and Kankal, S. B. (2014). Investigation of optimum operating parameters for BOD & COD removal using activated carbon. International Journal of Recent Development in Engineering and Technology, 2(4). [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagos, K., Zong, J., Li, D., Liu, C. and Lu, X. Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ibrahim, A. H., Dahlan, I., Adlan, M. N. and Dasti, A. F. (2012). Comparative study on characterization of Malaysian palm oil mill effluent. Research Journal of Chemical Sciences, 2(12). [Google Scholar]
  7. Liew, L. N., Shi, J. and Li, Y. (2011). Enhancing the solid-state anaerobic digestion of fallen leaves through simultaneous alkaline treatment. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8828-34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X. and Ren, G. (2015). Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45(540-55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Müller, H. W. and Trösch, W. (1986). Screening of white-rot fungi for biological pretreatment of wheat straw for biogas production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 24(2), 180-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Noike, T., Endo, G., Chang, J. E., Yaguchi, J. and Matsumoto, J. (1985). Characteristics of carbohydrate degradation and the rate-limiting step in anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Bioeng, 27(10), 1482-9. [Google Scholar]
  11. O-Thong, S., Boe, K. and Angelidaki, I. (2012). Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of oil palm empty fruit bunches with palm oil mill effluent for efficient biogas production. Applied Energy, 93(648-54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Penaud, V., Delgenes, J. and Moletta, R. (1999). Thermo-chemical pretreatment of a microbial biomass: influence of sodium hydroxide addition on solubilization and anaerobic biodegradability. Enzyme and microbial technology, 25(3), 258-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Prasad, D. Y. (1991). Biogas generation from bagasse-based paper mills by anaerobic digestion. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology, 51(4), 515-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rabelo, S. C., Carrere, H., Maciel Filho, R. and Costa, A. C. (2011). Production of bioethanol, methane and heat from sugarcane bagasse in a biorefinery concept. Bioresource Technology, 102(17), 7887-95. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rittmann, B. E. and McCarty, P. L. (2001), Environmental biotechnology: Principles and applications, McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  16. Saputra, T., Triatmojo, S. and Pertiwiningrum, A. (2010). Produksi biogas dari campuran feses sapi dan ampas tebu (bagasse) dengan rasio C/N yang berbeda. Buletin Peternakan, 34(2). [Google Scholar]
  17. Shuler, M. L. and Kargi, F. (2001), Bioprocess engineering: Basic concepts, Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.