EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 246 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 246 (2018) 01042 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 246, 2018
2018 International Symposium on Water System Operations (ISWSO 2018)
Article Number 01042
Number of page(s) 9
Section Main Session: Water System Operations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601042
Published online 07 December 2018
  1. Xie Yanfang. Discussion on emergency response mechanism of flood control in Beijing[J].Beijing Water, 2014(4):46-48, 58. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang Yi. Main causes and Countermeasures of urban flood disaster in Beijing[J]. China Flood and Drought Management, 2011, 21(6):27-28. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu Hongwei, Liu Shu, Zhu Jinliang, Yin Yue, Li Yuchen. Discussion on the crux of urban waterlogging and policy suggestions[J]. China Flood and Drought Management, 2011, 21(6):27-28. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hou Lei. Reflections on City Waterlogging Disaster Emergency Management and Its Countermeasures[J]. Public Administration and Law, 2015,(01):5-9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Suriya S, Mudgal B V. Impact of urbanization on flooding: the Thirusoolam sub watershed: A case study. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 412: 210-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shi P J, Du J, Ji M X. Urban risk assessment research of major natural disasters in China[J]. Advances in Earth Science. 2006, 21(2): 170-177. [Google Scholar]
  7. Debo.T N, Reese A. Municipal Storm Water Management[M]. United States: The Chemical Rubber Company (CRC) Press, 2002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu Dasheng. Water supply: China’s sponge cities to soak up rainwater.[J]. Nature, 2016, 537(7620):. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yun-Fang Ning, Wen-Yi Dong, Lu-Sheng Lin, Qian Zhang. Analyzing the causes of urban waterlogging and sponge city technology in China[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, 59(1):. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wen Sheng Zhang, Qian Xie, Ji Jun Zhu, Ming Cong Feng, Bo Hang Liu. The Early Warning and Algorithm Implementation of Urban Road Submergence in Heavy Rains[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 3082(543):. [Google Scholar]
  11. Weiwei Shao, Haixing Zhang, Jiahong Liu, Guiyu Yang, Xiangdong Chen, Zhiyong Yang, Hao Huang. Data Integration and its Application in the Sponge City Construction of CHINA[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 154:. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yutao Wang, Mingxing Sun, Baimin Song. Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China[J]. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 2017, 122:. [Google Scholar]
  13. Justine Henonin, Beniamino Russo, Ole Mark, Philippe Gourbesville. Real-time urban flood forecasting and modelling – a state of the art[J]. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2013, 15(3):. [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosenthal, Uriel and Alexander Kouzmin. Crisis Management and Institutional Resilience: An. [Google Scholar]
  15. William J. Petak, Arthur A. Atkisson. Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy[M]. New York:Springer-Verlag, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  16. Apel Heiko, Thieken Annegret H, Merz, Bioschl Gunter. A probabilistic modelling system for assessing flood risks[J]. Natural Hazards 2006(38):79-100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ma Yajie, Su Youpo, Liu Ruixing. Preliminary Study on Risk Assessment of Disaster Prevention Parks[M]. Progress in Safety Science and Technology (Vol.V) Part B, Science Press, Science Press USA Inc.2010, 1535-1538. [Google Scholar]
  18. Local Capability Self-assessment and Accreditation Tool, Florida Emergency Preparedness Association. September, 2002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fantina Tedim, Salete Carvalho. Flood Management Strategies in Frequent and Small Scale Events: Lessons Learned from Amarante (Portugal)[J]. Quaestiones Geographicae, 2010, 29(3). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.