Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 246, 2018
2018 International Symposium on Water System Operations (ISWSO 2018)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 5
Section Main Session: Water System Operations
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824601002
Published online 07 December 2018
  1. Aberle, J.; Nikora, V.; Walters, R. Data Interpretation for In Situ Measurements of Cohesive Sediment Erosion. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering (ASCE), 132, 581–588 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gerbersdorf, S. U.; Jancke, T.; Westrich, B. Sediment Properties for Assessing the Erosion Risk of Contaminated Riverine Sites. An approach to evaluate sediment properties and their covariance patterns over depth in relation to erosion resistance. First investigations in natural sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 7, 25–35 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, Y.; Lu, J.; Liao, H.; Wang, J.; Fan, B.; Yao, S. Research on cohesive sediment erosion by flow: An overview. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 51, 2001–2012 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grabowski, R. C.; Droppo, I. G.; Wharton, G. Erodibility of cohesive sediment: The importance of sediment properties. Earth-Science Reviews, 105, 101–120 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, W.; Perera, C.; Smith, J.; Sanchez, A. Critical shear stress for erosion of sand and mud mixtures. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1, 96–110, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Paterson, D. M. Short-term changes in the erodibility of intertidal cohesive sediments related to the migratory behavior of epipelic diatoms. Limnology and Oceanography, 34, 223–234, (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amos, C. L.; Grant, J.; Daborn, G. R.; Black, K. Sea Carousel—A benthic, annular flume. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 34, 557–577, (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. McNeil, J.; Taylor, C.; Lick, W. Measurements of Erosion of Undisturbed Bottom Sediments with Depth. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122, 316–324 (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gust, G.; Muller, V. Interfacial hydrodynamics and entrainment functions of currently used erosion devices. In Cohesive sediments; Burt, N., Parker, R., Watts, J., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 149–174 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  10. Kern, U.; Haag, I.; Schürlein, V.; Holzwarth, M.; Westrich, B. Ein Strömungskanal zur Ermittlung der tiefenabhängigen Erosionsstabilität von Gewässersedimente. WasserWirtschaft, 89, 72–77 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  11. Roberts, J. D.; Jepsen, R. A.; James, S. C. Measurements of sediment erosion and transport with the adjustable shear stress erosion and transport flume. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129, 862–871 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Aberle, J.; Nikora, V.; McLean, S.; Doscher, C.; McEwan, I.; Green, M.; Goring, D.; Walsh, J. Straight benthic flow-through flume for in situ measurement of cohesive sediment dynamics. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 129, 63–67 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Westrich, B.; Schmid, G.; Witt, O. Comprehensive Investigation on Cohesive Sediment Erodibility by Field and Laboratory Experiments. In 30. IAHR Congress: Water Engineering and Research in a Learning Society; Ganoulis, J., Prinos, Eds.; Thessaloniki, Greece, 993–998 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. Noack, M.; Gerbersdorf, S. U.; Hillebrand, G.; Wieprecht, S. Combining Field and Laboratory Measurements to Determine the Erosion Risk of Cohesive Sediments Best. Water, 7, 5061–5077 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gerbersdorf, S. U.; Jancke, T.; Westrich, B. Physico-chemical and biological sediment properties determining erosion resistance of contaminated riverine sediments – Temporal and vertical pattern at the Lauffen reservoir/River Neckar, Germany. Limnologica - Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 35, 132–144 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Förstner, U.; Heise, S.; Schwartz, R.; Westrich, B.; Ahlf, W. Historical Contaminated Sediments and Soils at the River Basin Scale: Examples from the Elbe River Catchment Area. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 4, 247–260 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lick, W. J. Sediment and contaminant transport in surface waters; CRC Press, ISBN 978-1-4200-5987-8 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. Wölz, J.; Cofalla, C.; Hudjetz, S.; Roger, S.; Brinkmann, M.; Schmidt, B.; Schäffer, A.; Kammann, U.; Lennartz, G.; Hecker, M.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Hollert, H. In search for the ecological and toxicological relevance of sediment re-mobilisation and transport during flood events. J Soils Sediments, 9, 1–5 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Beckers, F.; Haun, S.; Noack, M. Experimental investigation of reservoir sediments. Proceedings of Riverflow 2018, Lyon, France (2018) [Google Scholar]
  20. Witt, O.; Westrich, B. Quantification of erosion rates for undistrubed contaminated cohesive sediment cores by image analysis. Hydrobiologia, 494, 271–276 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Noack, M.; Schmid, G.; Beckers, F.; Haun, S.; Wieprecht, S. PHOTOSED—PHOTOgrammetric Sediment Erosion Detection. Geosciences, 8, 243 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Farnebäck, G. Two-Frame Motion Estimation Based on Polynomial Expansion. In Image Analysis; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 363–370 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Houwing, E.-J.; van Rijn, L. C. In Situ Erosion Flume (ISEF): determination of bed-shear stress and erosion of a kaolinite bed. Journal of Sea Research, 39, 243–253 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tolhurst, T. J.; Black, K. S.; Paterson, D. M.; Mitchener, H. J.; Termaat, G. R.; Shayler, S. A. A comparison and measurement standardisation of four in situ devices for determining the erosion shear stress of intertidal sediments. Continental Shelf Research, 20, 1397–1418 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Haag, I.; Kern, U.; Westrich, B. Erosion investigation and sediment quality measurements for a comprehensive risk assessment of contaminated aquatic sediments. Science of The Total Environment, 266, 249–257 (2001) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.