Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2018
International Scientific Conference on Energy, Environmental and Construction Engineering (EECE-2018)
Article Number 11010
Number of page(s) 6
Section Innovative Technologies for Technosphere Safety
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201824511010
Published online 05 December 2018
  1. V.A. Sidorenko Safe use of atomic (nuclear) power (nuclear safety), (2013), pp 1621-1630 [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Hotynchan, Tkachenko I. Analysis of ensuring safety at nuclear power plants, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. R E Hester, R M Harrison Nuclear Power and the Environment (2011) [Google Scholar]
  4. A.V. Yablokov, V.B. Nesterenko, A.V. Nesterenko, Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. Official web-site of ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation URL: http://www.rosatom.ru/ [Google Scholar]
  6. under general editorship of E. V. Ametistova, Fundamentals of the modern power industry, (2008). (RUS) [Google Scholar]
  7. V.A. Sidorenko Safety of Atomic (Nuclear) Power Use (Nuclear Safety), (2012), pp 3-17, (RUS) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Gerace, Understanding verification and validation of product model data in industry, (2013); [Google Scholar]
  9. IEEE Guide--Adoption of the Project Management Institute (PMI(R)) Standard A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK(R) Guide), Fourth Edition; [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Roache Verification vs. Validation. Mechanical Engineering, (1995); [Google Scholar]
  11. G. Kozinetс, Magazine of Civil Engeneering, (2012). pp. 3037 (RUS); [Google Scholar]
  12. IAEA Safety standards Series No. GSR Part 2, Leadership and management for safety (2016); [Google Scholar]
  13. IAEA Safety standards Series No GS-G-3.1, Application of the management system for facilities and activities, (2006); [Google Scholar]
  14. INSAG-12 Basic safety principles for nuclear power plants: 75-INSAG-3 rev. 1 / a report by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group. — Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. F. Evernden Verification of nuclear testing, (1985). pp 792a-794 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. El Baradei Ensuring nuclear safety & security, (2001). pp 32-33. [Google Scholar]
  17. M.M. Nesterchuk, V.A. Lebedynets, A.V. Bursakov Qualification of the equipment in pharmaceutical pro-file laboratories, (2009), pp 17-22. [Google Scholar]
  18. M.S. Baxter Commercial nuclear power, assuring safety for the future journal of environmental radioactivity, (1999), pp 106-108 [Google Scholar]
  19. NE-BP Nuclear energy basic principles. International Atomic Energy Agency, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  20. Safety reports series #3, equipment qualification in operational nuclear power plants: upgrading, preserving and reviewing, International Atomic Energy Agency, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  21. I.A. Ostapenko, D.V. Goranchuk, D.M. Kosyak Methods of assessing the current state of equipment qualification in Ukrainian NPPs, (2012), pp 8-11 [Google Scholar]
  22. CEC Qualification Benchmark Group. Comparison of European Practices for the Qualification of Electrical and I&C Equipment Important to Safety for LWR Nuclear Power Plant, (1992) [Google Scholar]
  23. IEC/IEEE 60780-323, Nuclear facilities Electrical equipment important to safety – Qualification, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. V.A. Barvinok, L.A. Naumov, A.V. Dolgikh, Increase of the role of conformity assessment at the facilities controlled by the federal service on ecological, technological and nuclear supervision, (2012), pp 226-232, (RUS) [Google Scholar]
  25. A.S. Pecherkin, Perspektivy razvitiya edinoy sistemy otsenki sootvetstviya na ob’’ektakh. Podkontrol’nykh rostekhnadzoru, (2009), pp 9-10 (RUS) [Google Scholar]
  26. R. D. Adcock et al, “Representing Systems with Models”, “System Verification”, and “System Validation” in: BKCASE Editorial Board. (2015); [Google Scholar]
  27. Safety Guide, Safety Series No. 50-SG-D11 General Design Safety Principles for Nuclear Power Plants, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, (1986). [Google Scholar]
  28. S.Ya. Petrov, V.I. Afanasyev, A.D. Melnik, M.I. Mironov, A.S. Navolotsky, V.G. Nesenevich, M.P. Petrov, F.V. Chernyshev, I.V. Kedrov, E.G. Kuzmin, B.V. Lyublin, S.S. Kozlovski, A.N. Mokeev, Probl. At. Sci. Technol. Ser. Thermonucl. Fusion 39 (1) (2016) [Google Scholar]
  29. M.S. Khvostova Power Technol. Eng. 45 (6) (2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. Z. Bazaras, B. Timofeev, N. Vasilieva, N. Bykovskiy, R. Kersys, L. Raslavicius, Intelligent Technol. Logist. Mechatronics Syst., ITELMS Proc. Int. Conf. (2011), pp. 29-32. [Google Scholar]
  31. L.B. Getsov, B.Z. Margolin, D.G. Fedorchenko, Mater. Tehnologije 42 (6) (2008) [Google Scholar]
  32. V.I. Grigor’ev, O.E. Piskun, V.M. Ivanov, Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.