Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 06043
Number of page(s) 8
Section Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Science (SCI) & Mathematics (SM)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815006043
Published online 27 March 2018
  1. M. Paulic, T. Irgolic, J. Balic, F. Cus, A. Cupar, and T. Brajlih, Procedia. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  2. V. Raja and K. Fernandes, Reverse engineering: an industrial perspective, Springer Science & Business Media (2007). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Gameros, L. De Chiffre, H.R. Siller, J. Hiller, and G. Genta, CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 9, 116–124 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Wang, Reverse engineering: Technology of reinvention, CRC Press (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Raja and K. Fernandes, Reverse engineering system, Springer Science & Business Media (2007). [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Rooppakhun and N. Chantarapanich, Forensic Medicine - From Old Problems to New Challenges , Creative Commons (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Fuentes and K. Donaldson, 2016 NCUR Proceedings (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. G. Constantinou, G. Wilson, S. Sadeghi-Esfahlani, and M. Cirstea, 2017 International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2017 Intl Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines and Power Electronics (ACEMP), 1083–1088. IEEE (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. P. Minetola, L. Iuliano, and F. Calignano, Comput. Ind. 67, 54–71 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Morovič and P. Pokorný, Adv. Mater. Res. vol. 468-471, 2269–2273 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Vagovský, I. Buranský, and A. Görög, Procedia Eng. 100, 1198–1206 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Renne, M. Ludlow, J. Fryml, Z. Schurch, A. Mennito, R. Kessler, and A. Lauer, J. Prosthet. Dent. 118, 1, 36–42 (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Marciniec, G. Budzik, T. Dziubek, and M. Grzelka, J. KONES (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Budzik and T. Dziubek, Diagnostyka. 1, 51–56, Polish Society for Technical Diagnostics (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. C. von Wilmowsky, B. Bergauer, E. Nkenke, F.W. Neukam, W. Neuhuber, M. Lell, A. Keller, S. Eitner, and R.-E. Matta, J. Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 43, 8, 1335–1339 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Jonkergouw, F. Allé, K. Chellaoui, J. VanderSloten, and D. Vangeneugden, Med. Eng. Phys. 38, 12, 1513–1517 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L.C. Ebert, P. Flach, W. Schweitzer, A. Leipner, S. Kottner, D. Gascho, M.J. Thali, and R. Breitbeck, J. Forensic Radiol. Imaging. 5, 1–7 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. P. Urbanová, P. Hejna, and M. Jurda, Forensic Sci. Int. 250, 77–86 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Przestacki, R. Majchrowski, and L. Marciniak-Podsadna, Appl. Surf. Sci. 388, 420–423 (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Adán, B. Quintana, A. Vázquez, A. Olivares, E. Parra, and S. Prieto, Sensors. 15, 5, 11551–11574, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Kriegel, C. Rink, T. Bodenmüller, and M. Suppa, J. Real-Time Image (2015). [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Koutecký, D. Paloušek, and J. Brandejs, Opt. -Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 124, 18, 3705–3709 (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. V. Sequeira, K. Ng, E. Wolfart, J.G.M. Gonçalves, and D. Hogg, ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54, 1, 1–22 (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Packianather, F. Chan, C. Griffiths, S. Dimov, and D. Pham, Procedia CIRP (2013). [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Alotto, M. Gaggero, and G. Molinari, 3, 22, IEEE Trans. on Magnetics (1997). [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Dobslaw, Proceeding of the International Conference on Computer Mathematics and Natural Computing 2010, WASET (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.