Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 06013
Number of page(s) 5
Section Information & Communication Technology (ICT), Science (SCI) & Mathematics (SM)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815006013
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. R. Amit, & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal; 14, (1), pp. 33–46. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, D. (2001). Research Methods for the Empirical Investigation of the Process of Formation of Operations strategy. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(8), 1076-1095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beach, R. Muhlemann, A.P. Price, D. Paterson, A. &Sharp, J. (2000). Manufacturing Operations and Strategic Flexibility: Survey and Cases. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(1), 7-30 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatt, G. & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253–277. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolden, R. Waterson, P. Warr, P. Clegg, C. & Wall, T. (1997). A new taxonomy of modern manufacturing practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17(11), 1112-1130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coates, T. (2002). An Exploratory Analysis of New Competences: a Resource-Based View. Journal of Operations Management 20(5), 435-450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haifeng. T.G. Yezhuang & Zhandong, L. (2006). An empirical analysis on relationships of manufacturing practices and manufacturing capabilities. Paper presented at the International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hair, J. Anderson, R. Tatham, R. & Black, W. (2007). Multivariate data analysis with readings [Google Scholar]
  9. Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal. Vol 13. 135-144 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Katz, R. Rebentisch, E. & Allen, T. (1996) A Study of Technology Transfer in a Multinational Cooperative Joint Venture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. [Google Scholar]
  11. Li, X. (2000). Manufacturing Capability development in a changing business environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100(6), 261-270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Narasimhan, S.T., Swink & Kim, D. (2005). An exploratory study of manufacturing practice and performance interrelationships, Implications for capability progression. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(10), 1013-1033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Grobler, A. (2007). A dynamic view on strategic resources and capabilities applied to an manufacturing strategy literature Journal Of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(3). [Google Scholar]
  14. Sohal, M. Gordon, M.T. Fuller & Simon, K. (1999). Manufacturing practices and compatibility : An Australian study. Technovation, 19(5), 295–304 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Narasimhan, T. (2005). An exploratory study of manufacturing practice and performance interrelationships, Implications for capability progression. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(10), 1013-1033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Swink, M. (1998). Core manufacturing capabilities and their links to product differentiation. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18(4), 374-396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Teece D. & Shuen, A. (1997).Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yang, B., Burns, N.D. & Backhouse, C.J. (2004). Postponement: A Review and Integrated Framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(5), 468-487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeleny, M.(1986). High technology management, Human Systems Management, 6(2), pp. 109-120. [Google Scholar]
  20. Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business Research Methods. Ford Worth:The dryden Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.